Issues related to Interprovincial Migration in Quebec: A Latin American Perspective

Volume 1(1): 2017

MILAGROS B. CALDERÓN MOYA, McGill University

 

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this qualitative study is to examine the perspectives of skilled Latin American immigrants towards interprovincial migration in Quebec. This entails examining the factors affecting their integration in Quebec in terms of education and employment as well as pointing out policies and educational strategies that could improve relations between new immigrants and Quebec society at large. To achieve this, the study will revise concepts of Systemic Discrimination, the Quebec Educational Model, and Whiteness to establish a theoretical framework for the research. Data will be collected from face-to-face interviews conducted with study participants and other stakeholders residing in Montreal, Laval and Quebec City, from a participatory research method called photovoice, and from my own reflective memos. Moreover, I will use Constant Comparison Analysis to develop a grounded theoretical perspective. This proposed study aims to highlight how the lack of adequate awareness of diversity in public school philosophies has resulted in the othering of minority groups in Quebec, and made their departure towards other more welcoming provinces more likely. This research will provide immigration authorities and education specialists with tools that can provide fair educational and employment opportunities that truly resemble Quebec’s democratic values to Quebec’s current and future newcomers.

RÉSUMÉ

Le but de cette étude qualitative est d’examiner les perspectives des immigrants qualifiés venant de l’Amérique latine vers une migration interprovinciale au Québec. Cela implique d’examiner les facteurs qui affectent leur intégration au niveau de leur éducation et de leur emploi, en plus d’identifier les programmes et les stratégies éducatives susceptibles d’améliorer les relations entre les nouveaux immigrants et la société québécoise en général. Pour ce faire, cette étude révisera les concepts de la discrimination systémique, le modèle d’éducation québécois et celui de la blanchitude (whiteness) afin d’établir un cadre théorique de recherche. Les données seront recueillies à partir d’entretiens privés effectués en personne avec les participants de recherche et d’autres personnes concernées résidant à Montréal, à Laval et dans la ville de Québec, et ce à partir d’une méthode de recherche de participation appelée photovoice et de mes propres notes. De plus, j’utiliserai l’analyse de comparaison constante pour développer une perspective théorique solidement ancrée. Cette étude vise à souligner comment le manque de sensibilisation à la diversité au sein de la philosophie des programmes dans les écoles publiques a entraîné la formation de groupes minoritaires au Québec et a augmenté la probabilité de leur départ vers d’autres provinces plus accueillantes. Cette recherche fournira aux autorités d’immigration et aux spécialistes d’éducation des outils qui procureraient aux nouveaux arrivants, actuels et futurs du Québec des possibilités d’éducation et d’emploi équitables ressemblant réellement aux valeurs démocratiques du Québec.

Keywords: Latin Americans, minorities, integration, discrimination, school curriculum.

Introduction

Successful host societies are mainly measured by how well their immigrants are economically, socially, politically, and culturally integrated into their communities (Picot & Hou, 2010). Such a measurement involves the difficult task of understanding the different social behaviours and phenomena of immigrants and host societies. This is especially true when it comes to the analysis of out-migration, the process of people permanently leaving a place in order to live in another one. Indeed, interprovincial migration, is a nation-wide issue in Canada, which in the case of Quebec has become central to its persistent need for immigration, defined by the international movement of people into a destination which on average has a positive impact on the economy of the host society.

Quebec has shown continuous annual losses in population through interprovincial migration over the past 45 years (Clemens, Labrie, & Emes, 2016). From 2007 to 2012, 40,000 residents left through out-migration (Mehler, 2012), two-thirds of whom were allophones (speakers of languages other than French and English). According to Quebec-based research group Institut de recherche et d’informations socio-économiques (IRIS, 2016), most immigrants to Quebec have higher levels of education than their Canadian-born counterpart. However, statistics from the 2011 National Household Survey report that despite being highly educated, immigrants to Quebec are facing inherent difficulties associated with entering the labour market. This is especially the case for recent immigrants who are considered part of minority groups, namely, immigrants from African, Asian, and Latin American countries (Geva, Gottardo, & Farnia, 2009; Haider, 2013). Moreover, a 2016 report by IRIS revealed that unemployment, low income, and overqualification are higher among newcomers to Quebec (CBC, 2016). Specifically, IRIS reported that 43% of Quebec’s immigrants are overqualified for their jobs (Valiante, 2016). In fact, many decide to settle for low-paying jobs, while others decide to leave for provinces offering greater job opportunities (Omidvar, Richmond, & Laidlaw Foundation, 2003).

Quebec’s out-migration exposes the discrepancy between Quebec’s successful strategies in attracting highly educated immigrants and its disregard for the discriminatory acts minority group immigrants continuously face. Indeed, interprovincial migration has resulted in high economic and social expenditures for Quebec’s government program for integrating immigrants. What is more, such expenditures have contributed to the older age structure of the province’s population.

Research on immigration issues in Canada has revealed that there are significant links between race, culture, and education affecting immigrants’ integration (Baklid, 2004). However, while this body of research offers significant findings, we have little understanding about the economic integration experiences of minority group immigrants that result in interprovincial migration from Quebec. More importantly, understanding the distinctiveness of immigrant integration processes requires a focus on the perspectives of the population involved, and how they draw on familial mechanisms and social ideologies to face such a problem. To illustrate, family aspirations, ideologies, and parental roles in care are some of the cultural strengths of the Latin American immigrant group facing integration barriers (Calderon, 2016).

Latin American Immigrant Integration

Research in the social sciences in Quebec explains that a large Latin American ethnic group has faced discriminatory practices in the job market, education, housing, law, and the justice system (Dei, 2011). This is also the case in the TV, and film industry in Quebec (Fundira, 2016). Such practices have resulted in social, economic, and political marginalization (Verkuyten & Martinovic, 2006). Indeed, the Latin American community, which encompasses 20 different nationalities, represents the second non-official language group in the province of Quebec, especially in the city of Montreal (Statistics Canada, 2016). In addition, much of this immigration comes from low-and middle-income countries, and most of these immigrants and their children differ from non-immigrants in appearance, language, religion, and culture (Masten, Liebkind, & Hernandez, 2012). One specific example is Julio Zuñiga, a Chilean-born computer technician who successfully fought cultural discrimination twice at the Human Rights Commission (Lalonde, 2014, 2015). His first complaint was in 1988 when he was fired from a Montreal school board for speaking French with a Spanish accent. The second complaint was against two coworkers in Quebec’s Department of Culture and Communications for repeated harassment over his ethnic background in 2000.

While Quebec has long supported legal protection for equality and antidiscrimination legislation, these laws cannot regulate social attitudes in decision makers nor can they regulate the attitudes of citizens at large. Quebec’s interculturalism model, which implies building coherent support for cultural diversity within the framework of the French language, supports the establishment of equality and the prevention of discrimination and racism. Nevertheless, it has been the subject of scholarly and societal critique as its main aim has been the linguistic and cultural assimilation of minority groups into the francophone society (Ghosh & Abdi, 2013; Talbani, 1993). In 2015, Jacques Frémont, the president of Quebec’s Human Rights Commission, severely criticized the government for not acknowledging that racism and systemic discrimination is present in the province’s workplaces (Authier, 2015). Frémont specifically pointed out how such issues have not been adequately addressed thus fracturing the confidence between the dominant society and the immigrant population. Following this assertion, the voices of various activists from community groups in racialized zones in Montreal, such as Montreal Nord, and ethno-cultural associations gathered to collect signatures for a petition to launch a public commission into systemic racism in Quebec in 2016 (Shingler, 2016). Sociologist Gérard Bouchard and political philosopher Charles Taylor, who were responsible for conducting Quebec’s Commission on Reasonable Accommodation in 2007, also raised their concerns (Shingler, 2016). These calls for a public commission have resulted in the province’s public consultation on systemic discrimination and racism that is currently taking place and will continue through the fall of the present year (Bellemare, 2017). These calls for a public commission have resulted in the province’s public consultation on systemic discrimination and racism that was announced to take place in the fall of the present year (Bellemare, 2017). However, Quebec’s government has recently decided to cancel the hearing process and opted for a one-day forum on the fight against immigrant unemployment in December (Fletcher, 2017; Authier, 2017).

In this context, interviewing Latin American immigrants on their integration experiences will produce useful data about how systemic discrimination may or may not influence their attitudes towards out-migration. This study will be the first in Canada to examine the perspectives of the Latin American minority group towards interprovincial migration. It will provide up-to-date information that may be applicable to other minority groups in Quebec, and could be used to gain new insights into the phenomenon of out-migration to avoid future social and economic divisiveness.

Research Context

In order to fully understand the context of this situation, it is important to review some of the key factors such as, Systemic Discrimination, the Quebec Educational Model, and Whiteness that provide a framework for this research.

Systemic Discrimination

Immigration policy is the most common form of regulating populational growth. Canadian immigration policies were undoubtedly discriminatory for many decades as “[t]he institutionalized hierarchy of ethnic preferences” plainly excluded non-white applicants (Potvin, 2010, p. 269). In general, the immigration restrictions were based on race, language and national origin until the 1960s. These laws and policies mainly sought individuals from Britain, America and Northern European nations, tolerated those from Southern European nations but excluded those from other nationalities (Potvin, 2010). However, in 1967, immigration policy became “technically non-racial” (Ghosh & Abdi, 2013, p. 88) when it welcomed immigrants from non-European nations, such as those from Asian and Latin American countries. In addition, despite the political tensions between the federal and the provincial governments over issues of belonging for immigrants (Banting & Soroka, 2012), Quebec, like its federal counterpart, has aimed to remedy discriminatory practices over the past decades. For instance, Quebec’s adoption of The Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms in 1976, which prohibited discriminatory acts in employment and housing in the province (Sheppard, 2010).

Nevertheless, critical gaps between the government’s normative discourse and inter-group relations have persisted in Quebec society and have considerably affected the social and economic integration of immigrants, especially members of visible minority groups (Potvin, 2010). Research by IRIS contends that discrimination in the labour market has resulted in the unsatisfactory employment situation of immigrants in Quebec. It also points out that “the increasing racialization [social process by which people come to be defined as being of a particular ‘race’ and thus subjected to negative treatment] of immigrants in Canada has intensified discrimination on the part of employers” (“Quebec immigrants,” 2016, para. 12). These rates, mainly measured by unemployment, over-qualification and under-representation in public sector agencies, are particularly high in the case of immigrants from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Indeed, the Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse’s reports that minority group immigrants have been “under-represented, subject to inequalities in remuneration, and professionally segregated” (as cited in Labelle, 2004, p. 11). Therefore, despite the government’s actions to ensure equality and antidiscrimination, reports of racism and lack of diversity in the workforce demonstrate that major issues still prevail in the effective integration of immigrants.

Indeed, Quebec has created strategies that promote several job creation and ethnic community funding programs in an effort to eradicate racism. In this regard, numerous studies have pointed out that the socio-demographic characteristics of immigrants as well as the historical and political context of host societies are all factors active in systemic discrimination (Feagin, 2013; Pager & Shepherd, 2008; Portes & Rumbaut, 2006). This is especially concerning because institutions take a passive role by overseeing how racial minority groups are affected by the under-utilisation of skills as well as the tensions between ethnic groups that may result from this prejudice (Reitz, 2005). Furthermore, many immigrant and minority group communities criticize the gap between the government’s rhetoric and the constant discrimination that many of them have been forced to face (Labelle, 2004).

The Quebec Educational Model

Public education in liberal multicultural societies is at a critical position today. Critical approaches point out the failure of the education system to build a nation based on democratic values that unite its diverse ethnic, cultural, and religious members (McDonough & Feinberg, 2003). As such, the fact of not adequately addressing and/or overseeing inequalities portrays the state as “the agent. . .of colonialization and oppression” (p. 2). In addition, critical pedagogical theories state that the structures and markers of difference, such as language and ethnicity, that perpetuate inadequate concepts and practices of equity result in the impediment of learners to be able to become analytical and critical enough to evaluate situations that go against the rights typical of a democracy (Giroux, 1992). Consequently, learners develop a partial and harmful understanding of complex societal issues such as segregation, marginalization, and xenophobia, thus compromising the development of positive contributions for their lives and society at large.

With the passing of the Charter of the French Language in 1977, Quebec’s public education became provincially mandated and Quebec’s intercultural education became the main agent in educational politics (Ghosh & Abdi, 2013). Quebec’s model has been subject to social and scholarly critique as its main aim has been the linguistic and cultural assimilation of minority groups into francophone society (Ghosh & Abdi, 2013; Talbani, 1993). Indeed, Quebec public schools do not provide learners with the tools to challenge oppression through curriculum or the school environment (Arshad-Ayaz, 2011; Ghosh & Abdi, 2013). Eurocentric values in education perpetuate the idea that the Western culture is superior to all other cultures, and reduce race and ethnicity “to a discourse of the Other” (Giroux, 1991, p. 220). The philosophy of education certainly misrepresents and marginalizes the presence of minority cultures other than those that are dominant in Quebec. Thus, the homogenizing influence of the Quebec government in public schools, as a result of Bill 101, which relegated Anglophone and Allophone languages to secondary status, highlights its responsibility in the spread of a message of francophone dominance.

In light of those pervasive issues, if the aim of Quebec’s interculturalism model is to promote liberal democratic values (as we believe they are) in the public education system, then these values need to be shaped within the various associations of minority groups. In this regard, the newest phase of liberalism, called affiliation liberalism by McDonough and Feinberg (2003) is characterized by its emphasis on cultural groups and the need for the state to secure the positive development of vulnerable groups within a congruent cultural context. As such, affiliation liberalism in an educational framework focuses on cultural sensitivity, awareness and respect from educators. Educators not only need to raise their awareness of the cultural, linguistic and ethnic differences between students but also empower students to challenge the practices and institutions of the dominant society which will help them develop a sense of self-confidence necessary to preserve their culture (Ghosh & Abdi, 2013; McDonough & Feinberg, 2003).

Whiteness

Although race is a social construct that lacks biological foundation (Yudell, Roberts, DeSalle, & Tishkoff, 2016), it remains a problematic and an inextinguishable concept that is present in today’s race-conscious world (Mo & Jandt, 2004). Whiteness, whether acknowledged or not, is “intrinsically linked to unfolding relations of domination” (Frankenberg, 1993, p. 6). Since notions of whiteness are based on Eurocentric discourses resulting from colonialism and neocolonialism, they go beyond discriminatory practices based on skin colour and have expanded to normative prejudice against other ethnocultural group (Shome, 1999) members of which are usually seen as inferior (Henry & Tator, 2006). While studies on whiteness have emerged in historical research on racial discrimination and racialized/colonized subjects such as African Americans and Native Americans, the impact of whiteness has also been recognized by sociology and cultural studies scholars, such as Giroux (1997) and Sleeter (1993). These scholars focus on the critical relations of whiteness with the political formation of American and European institutions where schools have substantial cultural gaps between immigrant children and teachers (Sleeter, 2016). With this in mind, the lack of awareness on this matter in public school philosophies can certainly impede future adequate responses from new generations towards the issues of equity, power relations, and social justice that minority groups have to confront.

It is essential to consciously recognize whiteness as “privilege, power, authority, normalcy, legitimacy, beauty, purity, and refinement” (Mo & Jandt, 2004, p. 59) that contributes to institutional problems. Some critical aspects in education that need to be analytically reviewed are the limited representation of minority groups in the teaching profession, the growing diversity of the student population, as well as teachers’ assumptions about non-white students’ learning difficulties (Mo & Jandt, 2004). Currently, multicultural pedagogy and programs are not adequately designed to equip white teachers to reflexively analyze the power of their roles as educators and representatives of a predominantly white host society (Sleeter, 2016). In addition, educational institutions need to question the adequacy of their treatment of cultural diversity in their programs as well as acknowledge their privilege from an unspoken position of power (Frankenberg, 1997). It is equally important to address early constructions of social identity in learners as a mechanism through which discriminatory practices manifest (Ali & Sonn, 2009; Green, Sonn, & Matsebula, 2007). In essence, Quebec’s intercultural education needs to develop broad-based understanding of the multi-layered issues that continue to enhance “otherness” (Arshad-Ayaz 2011) in order to provide school students with the tools to challenge oppression through curriculum and school environment.

Research Questions

The purpose of this study is to: a) identify the factors affecting immigrant integration in Quebec in terms of education and employment, and b) point out policies and strategies that could improve the relations between new immigrants and the Quebec society at large. This study is driven by three research questions:

  1. What are the perspectives of skilled Latin American immigrants regarding Quebec culture through the processes of entering the labour market, and how have these influenced their decisions towards settling in the province of Quebec?
  2. How, if at all, are skilled Latin American employment experiences influencing interprovincial migration in Quebec?
  3. What are their suggestions for providing fair opportunities to newcomers that could prevent the demographic and economic consequences of interprovincial migration?

Methodology

Qualitative research, as opposed to quantitative research, is especially effective in gaining the greatest amount of data when exploring culturally specific information about particular populations (Denzin & Lincoln, 2008; Mack, Woodsong, MacQueen, Guest, & Namey, 2005). Given the nature of the inquiry and the purpose of my research, this is the most appropriate approach to understand this situation within a particular context (Patton, 1985) and to grasp the underlying reasons and motivations. I will conduct a qualitative study for gaining insight into the dynamics of the Latin American minority group in Quebec. I will use face-to-face, semi-structured interviews for data collection to elicit responses to my research questions while permitting “topics and issues to be covered in the order most suited to the interviewee” (Ritchie, Lewis, Nicholls, & Ormston, 2013, p. 141). Some specific examples of questions are, “How did you find your first job in Quebec?” “How would you describe that experience?” “How would you describe the Quebec culture in the work environment?”In addition, I will use photovoice to further enhance the richness of the data collection as well as participants’ representation of the “strengths and concerns” (Wang & Burris, 1997, p. 369) of their cultural group. Photovoice is a process by which community members take photos that can identify, tell stories, and inform policymakers about issues of concern at the grassroots level (Wang, Cash, & Powers, 2000). Lastly, the use of memos will also be an important aspect of the research methodology to record the researcher’s immediate reactions and impressions, and include details that might not be explicitly stated during the interviews (Glaser, 1978). Reflective memos will be written on an ongoing basis to question the researcher’s biases and assumptions, as well as keep track of questions that could arise throughout the research process (Birks, Chapman, & Francis, 2008; Creswell, 2007; Glaser, 1978).

Participants and Selection

The participants in this study will comprise of 15 to 18 individuals as primary data sources and five stakeholders as secondary data sources. For the selection of primary data participants, I will use inclusion criteria based on Patton’s (1999) purposeful sampling. This is a type of ‘criterion sampling’ which ensures that the researcher selects participants who meet specific criteria. For this study, participants will be selected through a demographic survey form that will determine their eligibility. In addition, the purposeful sample will be based on accessibility of participants with the aim of including a varied range of Latin American nationalities, work domains, and time lived in Quebec.

For this study, the participant selection criteria will include the following:

  1. Participants who arrived in Canada as Quebec-selected skilled workers in the last 10 years from any Latin American country.
  2. Participants who are men or women, over 25 years of age.
  3. Participants who live in Montreal, Laval, and Quebec City or participants who left Quebec for another Canadian province.

Similarly, the collection of secondary data will serve to corroborate or confirm what emerges from the study (McMillian, 2000). As previously mentioned, secondary data will be obtained from five stakeholders. These will include:

  1. Spokespeople from cultural community groups and/or community associations.
  2. Latin Americans who arrived in Quebec as immigrants more than 20 years ago and currently live in the province.

In order to access the primary data source participants for my study, I will post an advertisement at institutions such as community centers, cultural associations, universities and/or colleges in the cities of Montreal, Laval and, Quebec City. Referrals will also be an important form of recruitment of interview subjects, and will be an exclusive recruitment process for the collection of secondary data (stakeholders). It is hoped that word of the study will spread among friends and colleagues who will voluntarily refer the researcher to other potential recruits.

Data Collection

As previously mentioned, data collection for this study will be based on qualitative approaches from interviews, photovoice, and reflective memos.

As the researcher, once I receive the contact information of voluntary respondents, I will immediately seek to establish a comfortable and trustworthy rapport with potential participants by answering all questions related to the purpose and nature of the study. For instance, the researcher will indicate the importance of using the demographic survey form to determine the adequacy of their participation in the study. As previously mentioned, surveys will verify eligibility for participation as well as give an overview of the pertinent demographic and contextual information such as age, sex, and, nationality, length of work experience in Quebec. Data from the completed surveys will be summarized and used to determine the purposeful sample of 15 to 18 individuals who meet the criteria of the study. Second, participants will then be sent a consent letter which includes a description of the purpose of the research and the requirements of participation, such as commitment to one 90-120-minute interview and follow up conversations as needed. The letter will also present potential risks and benefits of participation, information regarding privacy and confidentiality, details of how photovoice works as a research methodology, and an assurance that participants can withdraw from the study at any time and for any reason without penalty. This consent letter will be carefully developed and will outline the research process in language that can be easily understood by the participants. In addition, participants will also have to give their consent to use a digital audio recorder to preserve a verbatim version of the interview, which will be transcribed to provide the research data.

Interviews

Prior to conducting the interviews, I will develop an interview guide with questions to help facilitate the interviewing process. In addition, I will use open-ended questions to ensure that all questions or topics are explored with each interviewee (Patton, 1999). In order to obtain rich data from the participant interviews, I will apply a three-part interview protocol approach as advocated by Seidman (2013). This approach involves three separate interactions with each participant. The first exchange “establishes context of participants’ experience,” the second “allows participants to reconstruct experience within context,” and the third “encourages participants to reflect on meaning of experience” (p. 11).

In this study, this first exchange will be introductory and will be done via telephone. I will seek to establish a comfortable and trustworthy rapport with participants by explaining and answering all questions related to the purpose and nature of the study. For instance, I will explain that I am conducting a qualitative study to explore the perspectives of Latin American immigrants on interprovincial migration in Quebec. I will explain to participants that the interviews will be audiotaped, and the audiotapes and interview transcriptions will be secured throughout the duration of the study. Furthermore, I will share with participants the importance of their roles in photovoice to create the critical dialogue necessary to raise knowledge of the problems related to education and the labour market in their cultural group (Wang & Burris, 1997).

The second part of the interview protocol will be in the form of semi-structured face-to-face interviews which will take approximately 2 hours to complete, as mentioned before. For this, participants will be invited to set a date and time that is convenient for them as well as suggest a public setting where they feel physically and psychologically comfortable to conduct the interviews (King & Horrocks, 2010). I will do my best to ensure that the public spaces chosen provide safety, comfort, and privacy. Once data collection begins, interviews will be carefully transcribed. Next, I will review the transcriptions by following the recordings of the interviews to ensure that everything is transcribed as completely as possible. Transcriptions will be dated, labeled, and the lines numbered. Lastly, transcripts will be printed and placed in a binder that will be securely locked and stored at my place of residence. It is important to note that I will travel to conduct the face-to-face interviews with participants living out of the province. Participants living out of Quebec will also be invited to set the date, time as well as public setting, however, this will occur one month in advance of the interview.

For the last exchange with participants, they will be invited to review their interview transcriptions and corroborate preliminary findings. Since it can be difficult to retain participants for the duration of a study, this last protocol will be conducted by email after transcriptions are sent, and provide follow-up questions that are specific to individual participants (Turner, 2010).

As previously mentioned, interviews with other stakeholders will be used as secondary data sources. These will be conducted using the third research question of this study (i.e., What are their suggestions for providing fair opportunities to newcomers that could prevent the demographic and economic consequences of interprovincial migration?) as well as questions that emerge from the primary data collection. A three-part interview protocol approach (Seidman, 2013) will also be applied. Interviews with stakeholders will be conducted at the end of the final data gathering phase so as to not influence the researcher’s understanding of the perspectives of participants.

Photovoice

At the end of the second step of the interview protocol, immigrant participants will be asked to capture scenes that are relevant to their everyday lives. The researcher will make recommendations to participants on photographic ethics and power dynamics. These will include discussions on, for instance, the acceptability of photographing someone and, more importantly, the reasons why it is necessary to have someone’s written form permission before having him or her photographed (Haldenby, n.d.). Considering that the photovoice technique is highly flexible as it can be “adapted to the needs of its users” (Wang & Burris, 1997, p. 383), participants will not need to receive intensive training in photographic concepts. It is important to note that due to the widespread coverage of digital photography via cameras, cellphones, and other devices including tablets, participants will be asked to use their own devices. However, if any of the participants does not have such device, the researcher will provide one to them.

Reflective Memos

The use of memos will help to address any assumptions and/or biases the researcher might hold prior to undertaking the study. A specific example would rely on the fact that I am a member of the Latin American community in Montreal and thus acknowledges I have certain biases regarding integration. Memos will be hand-written in a journal after each interview. They will be dated, filed, and subsequently perused for insights as the analysis progressed.

Data analysis

Interviews

As previously mentioned, before starting the process of data analysis, all participants will be sent a copy of their transcribed interview electronically to verify the accuracy of their answers (Morrow, 2005). To analyze the interview data, the researcher will use a well-established approach known as the constant comparison analysis (CCA). This analytic approach ensures that the researcher develops an interpretation of the data inductively since “what becomes important to analyse emerges from the data itself” (Maykut & Morehouse, 1994, p. 127; Thomas, 2006). It is a rigorous means of unitizing the data, placing the units into categories, such as “getting a job interview” and “dealing with exclusion”, as patterns emerge, and assigning codes to categories. In a careful process of comparing and contrasting categories, these will be expanded and/or contracted until saturation, and then recombined in larger conceptual themes such as “Quebec culture” and “work environment”. Themes will be grounded in the data and provide a persuasive and trustworthy explanation of the topic being studied (Merriam, 2002).

Photovoice

After the second step of the interview protocol, the researcher will receive the photographs taken by primary data participants electronically. After the images have been printed, the researcher and participants will meet individually for an audio-recorded discussion. As mentioned before, the researcher will travel to conduct the interviews with participants living out of the province. The purpose of this discussion is to encourage participants to tell the story behind each photograph. Issues in the images will be defined and codes will be assigned to categories as they appear. Next, photovoice themes will be identified, analysed and then they will be compared with those that emerged in the 15 to 18 face-to-face interviews (second step of interview protocol). It is important to note that all additional exchanges necessary to clarify findings with participants will be done via Skype.

To conclude, the themes that result from the interviews with stakeholders will be compared with the themes that emerged in the interviews with immigrant participants and photovoice. Initial categories will be collapsed into a smaller number of categories within larger and more conceptual themes that will answer my research questions. Similarly, the researcher will revise the initial memos written after each interview to cross-check them with those written during the data analysis in order to elaborate on emerging issues (Strauss & Corbin, 1990).

Significance of Research

The findings of the proposed research will add qualitative and empirical insights to the existing body of literature about the Latin American cultural group in Quebec, and interprovincial migration from Quebec. By representing skilled Latin American immigrants’ experiences of integration in Quebec, it is anticipated that this research will provide immigration authorities, academics, and other education specialists with information that may lead to further development and implementation of policies that build towards equality. In addition, through the analysis of aspects of the Quebec culture that might be causing widespread discrimination in areas such as labour, education, and housing, the potential inadequacy of curriculum philosophies and school culture could be determined and combatted. Such changes could certainly result in a culturally sensitive education that prevents future discriminatory acts, strengthens the Quebec values of democracy, and rebuilds confidence within Quebec’s cultural diverse society.

References

Ali, L., & Sonn, C. (2009). Multiculturalism and whiteness: Through the experiences of second generation Cypriot Turkish. The Australian Community Psychologist, 21(1), 24-38.

Authier, P. (2015, January 28). Racism persists in Quebec, immigration committee told. Montreal Gazette. Retrieved from http://montrealgazette.com/news/quebec/quebec-has-work-to-do-to-fight-racism-and-discrimination-towards-immigrants-committee-reviewing-system-hears

Authier. P. (2017, October 4). Groups urge Quebec government to proceed with systemic racism hearings. Montreal Gazette. Retrieved from http://montrealgazette.com/news/quebec/quebec-will-rethink-systemic-racism-hearings-philippe-couillard-says

Baklid, B. (2004). The voices of visible minorities: Speaking out on breaking down barriers. Ottawa, ON: Conference Board of Canada.

Banting, K., & Soroka, S. (2012). Minority nationalism and immigrant integration in Canada. Nations and Nationalism, 18(1), 156-176.

Bellemare, A. (2017, July 20). Public consultation on systemic racism in Quebec to start in September. CBC News. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-consultation-systemic-racism-discrimination-1.4213793

Birks, M., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K. (2008). Memoing in qualitative research probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13(1), 68-75.

Calderon, M. M. (2016). A qualitative study of adult Latin Americans’ perceptions of their secondary school education in Montreal (Master thesis). Montreal: McGill University Libraries.

CBC News (2016, September 28). Quebec immigrants more likely to be unemployed, overqualified, report finds. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-immigrants-employment-jobs-1.3781412

Clemens J., Labrie Y. & Emes, J. (2016). Interprovincial Migration in Canada: Quebeckers Vote with Their Feet. Retrieved from https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/interprovincial-migration-in-canada-quebeckers-vote-with-their-feet

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Strategies of qualitative inquiry (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

DesRoches, S. J. (2014). Québec’s interculturalism: promoting intolerance in the name of community building. Ethics and Education, 9(3), 356-368.

Fletcher, R. (2017, October 18). Quebec cancels systemic discrimination consultations. Global News. Retrieved from https://globalnews.ca/news/3811908/quebec-cancels-systemic-discrimination-consultations/

Frankenberg, R. (1993). White women, race matters: the social construction of whiteness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Frankenberg, R. (Ed.). (1997). Displacing whiteness: essays in social and cultural criticism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Fundira, M. (2016, April 02). Minority communities ‘too niche’ for Quebec TV and film. CBC News. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/real-talk-on-race-lack-of-diversity-quebec-film-television-1.3517131

Geva, E., Gottardo, A., & Farnia, F. (2009). Children for whom English /French is not their first language. London, ON, CAN: Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network.

Ghosh, R., & Abdi, A. A. (2013). Education and the politics of difference: Select Canadian perspectives. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.

Giroux, H. A. (1992). Literacy, pedagogy, and the politics of difference. College Literature, 19(1), 1-11.

Giroux, H. A. (1997). White squall: Resistance and the pedagogy of whiteness. Cultural Studies, 11(3), 376-389.

Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Green, M. J., Sonn, C. C., & Matsebula, J. (2007). Reviewing whiteness: Theory, research, and possibilities. South African Journal of Psychology, 37(3), 389-419.

Haider, M. (2013, May 07). A country of immigrants should know how to integrate them. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/murtaza-haider/immigrant-unemployment-canada_b_3541813.html

Haldenby, T. (n.d). Photovoice. Retrieved from http://designresearchtechniques.com/casestudies/photovoice/

King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

Labelle, M. (2004). The “language of race”, identity options, and “belonging” in the Quebec context. In F. Devine & M. C. Waters (Eds.), Social inequalities in comparative perspective (pp. 39-65). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Lalonde, M. (2014, July 07). Immigrant’s book describes systemic cultural and racial discrimination in Quebec. The Gazette. Retrieved from http://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/immigrants-book-describes-systemic-cultural-and-racial-discrimination-in-quebec

Lalonde, M. (2015, January 30). Luis Zuniga wants to see more immigrants in Quebec’s public sector. The Gazette. Retrieved from http://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/luis-zuniga-wants-to-see-more-immigrants-in-quebecs-public-sector

Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K. M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods: A data collectors field guide. Durham, NC: Family Health International.

Masten, A. S., Liebkind, K., & Hernandez, D. J. (Eds.). (2012). Realizing the potential of immigrant youth. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Maykut, P. & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London: The Falmer Press.

McDonough, K., & Feinberg, W. (2003). Citizenship and education in liberal-democratic societies: Teaching for cosmopolitan values and collective identities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McMillan, J. H. (2000). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer (4th ed.). White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Mehler, A. (2012, December 21) New Canadians love Quebec, but they’re leaving it. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from https://theglobeandmail.com/news/national/new-canadians-love-quebec-but-theyre-leaving-it/article6673482/

Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.

Mo Bahk, C., & Jandt, F. E. (2004). Being white in America: Development of a scale. Howard Journal of Communications, 15(1), 57-68.

Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250.

Omidvar, R., Richmond, T., & Laidlaw Foundation. (2003). Immigrant settlement and social inclusion in Canada (pp. 1-23). Toronto, ON: Laidlaw Foundation.

Pager, D., & Shepherd, H. (2008). The Sociology of Discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 1, 181-209.

Patton, M.Q. (1985, April). Quality in qualitative research: Methodological principles and recent developments. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.

Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189.

Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2006). Immigrant America: a portrait. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

Potvin, M. (2010). Interethnic relations and racism in Quebec. In J. Rudy, S. Gervais, & C. Kirkey (Eds.), Quebec questions: Quebec studies for the twenty-first century (pp. 267-286). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reitz, J. G. (2005). Tapping immigrants’ skills: New directions for Canadian immigration policy in the knowledge economy. Law & Business Review of the Americas, 11, 409.

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.) (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications.

Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Sheppard, C. (2010). Inclusive equality: the relational dimensions of systemic discrimination in Canada. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Shingler, B. (2016, June 06). It’s time for Quebec to launch commission into systemic racism, group says. CBC News. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-systemic-racism-petition-1.3617787

Shome, R. (1999). Whiteness and the politics of location: Postcolonial reflections. In T. K. Nakayama & J. N. Martin (Eds.), Whiteness: The communication of social identity (pp. 107-128). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Sleeter, C. E. (1993). Advancing a white discourse: A response to Scheurich. Educational Researcher, 22(8), 13-15.

Sleeter, C. E. (2016). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2) 94-106.

Statistics Canada (2011). Linguistic characteristics of Canadians: Language, 2011 Census of Population. Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98-314-x/98-314-x2011001-eng.pdf

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Tator, C., & Henry, F. (2006). Racial Profiling in Canada: Challenging the myth of “a few bad apples”. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

Turner III, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754.

Valiante, G. (2017, February 05). Muslim immigrant cabbies say they face discrimination in Quebec City job market. CBC News. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/muslim-immigrant-job-market-1.3967841

Verkuyten, M., & Martinovic, B. (2006). Understanding multicultural attitudes: The role of group status, identification, friendships, and justifying ideologies. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(1), 1-18.

Yudell, M., Roberts, D., DeSalle, R., & Tishkoff, S. (2016). Taking race out of human genetics. Science, 351(6273), 564-565.

Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health education & behavior, 24(3), 369-387.

Wang, C. C., Cash, J. L., & Powers, L. S. (2000). Who knows the streets as well as the homeless? Promoting personal and community action through photovoice. Health Promotion Practice, 1(1), 81-89.

Understanding the connections between second language teacher identity, efficacy, and attrition:  A critical review of recent literature

Volume 1(1): 2017

PHILIPPA PARKS, McGill University

 

ABSTRACT

In the past decade, rising teacher attrition rates have garnered worldwide attention. Research into the phenomenon tells us that the problem is most acute for novice teachers—those with less than five years’ experience—and for teachers in certain subjects, including second language teachers. What is it about second language teachers that makes them particularly prone to leaving the profession? Much research to date has focused on what we can do to prevent teachers from leaving once they are in the field. There is, however, a dearth of research into what we can do to address the problem before it starts; in teacher education. This critical literature review looks at what links second language education research has made between second language (L2) teacher attrition and L2 teacher self-efficacy, and between L2 teacher self-efficacy and L2 teacher identity, synthesizing these ideas to discover how they might inform second language teacher education.

RÉSUMÉ

Au cours de la dernière décennie, la hausse du taux d’attrition chez les enseignants a attiré l’attention à travers le monde. La recherche sur le phénomène nous indique que le problème est plus grave pour les enseignants novices—ceux qui ont moins de cinq ans d’expérience—et pour les enseignants de certaines matières, y compris les enseignants de langue seconde. Pourquoi les enseignants de langue seconde sont ils plus particulièrement enclins à quitter la profession? Beaucoup de recherches à ce jour se sont concentrées sur ce qui peut être fait pour empêcher les enseignants à quitter l’enseignement une fois qu’ils sont dans le domaine. Par ailleurs, il existe une pénurie de recherche sur ce que nous pouvons faire pour éviter le problème avant qu’il ne se présente, soit au moment de la formation des enseignants. Cette revue critique de la littérature examine les liens établis par la recherche sur l’enseignement de la langue seconde entre l’attrition, l’auto-efficacité (“self-efficacy”) et l’identité des enseignants de langue seconde (L2), en synthétisant ces idées pour découvrir comment elles pourraient nous informer dans la formation des enseignants de langue seconde.

Keywords: Second language, teacher identity, teacher education, teacher attrition, teacher efficacy.

Introduction

The past decade has seen an increased interest in the crisis of teacher drop-outs; both in the media and in the field of Educational Research (e.g., Ashiedu & Scott-Ladd, 2012; Borman & Dowling, 2008; Ingersoll, 2003; Karsenti et al., 2013; Kutsyuruba et al., 2014). The problem is most acute for novice teachers—those with fewer than five years’ experience—and for teachers in certain subjects, including second language teachers, where the attrition rates are significant (Clark & Antonelli, 2009; Karsenti et al., 2013; Kutsyuruba et al., 2014). What is it about second language teachers that makes them particularly prone to leaving the profession? Second language (L2) education research has made links between L2 teacher attrition and L2 teacher self-efficacy (Swanson, 2012) and between L2 teacher self-efficacy and L2 teacher identity (Beauchamp & Thomas, 2009; Velez-Rendon, 2002; Wilbur, 2007). This literature review aims to synthesize these ideas to discover how they inform Teacher Education, answering the following questions: What does the literature tell us about the possible causes of second language teacher attrition? What are the possible links between second language teacher attrition, efficacy and identity?

Selecting the Related Studies for Critical Review

This review’s scope, while not exhaustive, attempts to answer the question: Why are novice second language teachers particularly prone to leaving the profession? Initial results using the terms “Second Language Teachers” and “Attrition” in academic search engines (e.g., Google Scholar, JSTOR, ERIC…) yielded several articles that identified “efficacy” as a key concept linked to attrition. “Teacher Efficacy” therefore became a new key term in my second round of research, with articles selected that focused primarily on second language teacher efficacy. Several of these articles identified “classroom management,” “pedagogical content knowledge,” and “linguistic proficiency” as key sub-concepts in second language teacher efficacy (e.g., Swanson, 2010; 2012, Wilbur, 2007). The third round of research focused on each of the sub-themes individually and selected articles that contained the key sub-term, for example “linguistic proficiency,” and another of the main search terms, for example “second language teacher efficacy.” “Teacher Identity” is another important concept that emerged. Several articles, such as Steinbach and Kazarloga’s (2014) research into how linguistic proficiency is an integral part of second language teacher identity, revealed a wealth of connections between second language teacher identity and second language teacher efficacy. In the final round of research terms matching “second language teacher identity” and those including or adjacent in meaning to “classroom management,” “pedagogical content knowledge,” and/or “linguistic proficiency” were included.

Figure 1: Second Language Teacher Attrition Research terms Source(s): Parks, 2017.
Figure 1: Second Language Teacher Attrition Research terms Source(s): Parks, 2017.

 

In total, 12 articles were retained with strong connections to the three main search terms linked by one or more of the sub-terms as described in Figure 1. These are summarized in Table 1.

Source Focus & Context Research Methods Key themes & sub-themes
Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk Hoy and Hoy (1998) Understanding the construct of Teacher efficacy and how to measure it. Comparing correlates collected from different tools measuring efficacy (e.g. Rand, Gibson & Dembo, Webb Efficacy scale). Teacher Efficacy (TE).
Velez-Rendon (2002) Overview of SLTE research findings. Critical literature review. Second Language Teacher (SLT) Education; Language proficiency; Pedagogical content knowledge.
Sfard & Prusak (2005) Second language teacher identity formation – identity as narrative; 17-year-old newly arrived immigrant students from the former Soviet Union in Israel. Narrative Inquiry. Teacher identity, narrative, identity as story.
Vargese, Morgan, Johnson & Johnson (2005) Understanding language teacher identity; creating a dialogue across paradigms. Juxtaposition of three studies of identity with diverse paradigms (social identity theory, theory of situated learning, identity as image-text). SLT Identity; NES (Native English Speaker) vs. NNES (Non-Native English speaker) identities; Linguistic competence.
Wilbur (2007) Examining the methodological training of SLT in 32 Teacher Education institutions in the United States. Document analysis of course syllabi; Cross-referenced with questionnaire about methodology instructors’ beliefs. SLT education, best practices; Linguistic proficiency (L2 Teacher Fluency); SL Teacher Identity; Pedagogical Content Knowledge.
Beauchamp & Thomas (2009) Overview of SL teacher identity research findings. Critical literature review. SLT identity formation; Emotion and identity; Narrative and discourse aspects of identity; Addressing identity in Teacher education.
Swanson (2010) Link between perceived efficacy and attrition; Foreign language (Spanish) teachers Georgia, United States. Survey of teachers using FL Teacher Efficacy Scale & Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale. SLT efficacy; SLT attrition; Linguistic proficiency; Pedagogical content knowledge; Teaching to beginners (teaching strategies).
Thomas and Beauchamp (2011) SLT professional identity development; Undergraduates in the SLT education programs – two Quebec Universities. Qualitative study: semi-structured interviews – asking participants to describe identity through metaphor. SLT Professional identity; SLT education; Metaphors; New teachers.
Swanson (2012) Link between perceived efficacy and attrition SLT teachers United States & Canada. Survey of teachers using FL Teacher Efficacy Scale & Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale. SLT efficacy; SLT attrition; Content knowledge (PCK); Facilitation of instruction; Cultural instruction; Classroom management.
Karsenti, Collin, Dumouchel (2013) Teacher attrition causes. Literature review of 69 scientific papers. Novice teacher attrition; Teaching tasks (lack of time, preparation); Teacher psychological characteristics; Social environment (administration); Classroom management problems.
Steinbach & Kazarloga (2014) Pre-service SLT attitudes toward native speaker proficiency; Linguistic and cultural identities as future ESL teachers; Fifty-four future pre-service teachers in Quebec. Online survey. SLT education; SLT professional identity; Linguistic identity; Cultural identity.

Table 1: Articles selected for review

This critical review aims to look at each of the key concepts of second language teacher attrition, efficacy, and identity, and how they are linked by the sub-concepts “classroom management,” “pedagogical content knowledge,” and/or “linguistic proficiency.” It attempts to synthesize these concepts in order to draw insights for second language teacher education. The review will start by looking at the three main concepts, “Teacher Attrition,” “Teacher Efficacy,” and “Teacher Identity,” drawing connections between the three and will then delve more closely into how they are integrally linked through the sub-concepts of linguistic proficiency, classroom management, and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK).

Teacher Attrition

Teacher attrition, that is, teachers leaving the profession prematurely before retirement, became the subject of much research focus in the early 2000s. Ingersoll (2003) describes the problem as a “revolving door—where large numbers of qualified teachers depart their jobs for reasons other than retirement” (p. 3). As Ingersoll and others (e.g., Borman & Dowling, 2008) discovered, the problem was particularly acute for novice teachers; that is, those with less than five years’ experience. Getting an exact understanding of the numbers of teachers leaving the profession, and how much it was costing society however, is problematic. As Karsenti, Collin and Dumouchel (2013) noted, some estimations gave a 46% attrition rate for novice teachers in the United States in the early 2000s, while others gave a range of 30%-50% for the same group in the same period. In Canada, similar estimates range from 30% for novice teachers nation-wide but varied widely province to province; for example, 15% in Quebec and 6-7% in Ontario (p. 554).

What is generally agreed upon was that the rate is much higher for novice teachers than for those with more than five years’ experience, and that teacher attrition has an extremely high cost, both in fiscal terms and in the human terms. Teacher turnover is clearly linked to a decrease in quality of teaching, social stability, and student achievement (Borman & Dowling, 2008). Interestingly, teachers of certain subjects, including teachers of second languages, have higher rates of attrition than teachers of other subject matters (Ashiedu & Scott, 2012; Clark & Antonelli, 2009; Kutsyuruba, Godden & Tregunna; 2013). What is it about language teachers that makes them more prone to leaving the profession prematurely? The answer to this question is complex and seems to lie, not solely on working conditions, or in the phenomenon of teacher burn-out, but also in the way language teachers see themselves and their abilities in the classroom. In fact, as this review will show, research has demonstrated a strong link between a language teacher’s sense of self-efficacy, and their intentions to remain in the field or leave the profession.

Teacher Efficacy

While much research into teacher attrition looks at personal and professional factors as well as working conditions as possible indicators for attrition (e.g., Borman & Dowling, 2008; Smith & Ingersoll, 2004), educational theorists, such as Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk Hoy, and Hoy (1998) arrived at the problem of attrition from a different starting point: efficacy theory. Advanced by Bandura in the 1970s, efficacy theory is a concept that describes a person’s belief in their abilities to do something well. For example, teacher-efficacy, has been defined as a teacher’s “belief in their ability to have a positive effect on student learning” (Ashton, 1985, p. 142). It is important to note that self-efficacy distinguishes itself from other concepts of self, such as self-esteem, because it is specific to a particular task (Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk Hoy, & Hoy, 1998) and because it has no basis in actual measurable ability, but is rather a reflection of a person’s’ belief in their abilities. Self-efficacy is of great interest to those studying attrition because it offers a tantalizing explanation for why some teachers are more resilient than others. As Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk-Hoy, and Hoy further explain:

One of the things that makes teacher efficacy so powerful is its cyclical nature. . . . Greater efficacy leads to greater effort and persistence, which leads to better performance, which in turn leads to greater efficacy. The reverse is also true. Lower efficacy leads to less effort and giving up easily, which leads to poor teaching outcomes, which then produce decreased efficacy. (pp. 233-234, italics added)

Teacher efficacy is a construct that shifts, that grows in response to success, or what Bandura (1997) calls mastery experiences. It diminishes when it encounters failure. Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk Hoy and Hoy (1998)’s explanation of the cyclical nature of teacher efficacy also points to an innateness of efficacy that has little to do with actual ability and more to do with self-perception. Here is where the concepts of teacher identity and teacher self-efficacy begin to merge.

Teacher Identity

The definition of identity, initially accepted by structuralists to be essential and fixed, is now more generally understood by poststructuralists to be a fluid (rather than fixed) construct that is constantly created and re-created depending on context (Sachs, 2005; Sfard & Prusak, 2005; Vargese, Morgan, Johnson & Johnson, 2005). People act as a “kind of person” during given times and places (Gee, 2000, p. 99). Identity also depends on being recognized as being a “kind of person” with certain abilities (Gee, 2000). In other words, identity depends less on a person’s actual ability than on their own, and others’, perceptions of that ability. A teacher’s professional identity is understood in much the same way as other identities; teachers perform their teacher identity in the classroom context in response to societal expectations of teacher appearance, abilities, and skills (Sachs 2005). This professional teacher identity can be entirely separate from the identity a teacher may perform as a colleague, parent, spouse or friend in different contexts (Pennington & Richards, 2016) and is created by teachers from “their own experiences as a student and as a teacher, their personal and professional histories inside and outside of schools, as well as the images of teachers presented in the popular media, films, fiction and so on” (p. 8).

Teacher identity and teacher self-efficacy have several things in common: first, they are both contextually specific; that is, they are performed or perceived according to the time, place and demands of a situation (Gee, 2000). Second, teacher efficacy like, identity, has less to do with actual ability, and more with how the teacher views his or her own abilities (Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk-Hoy & Hoy, 1998). As Bandura (1997) explained, teachers “may question their self-worth, despite being very competent, if important others do not value their accomplishments” (p. 6). Identity statements in general can be recognized syntactically as containing verbs such as “be”, “have” or “can” which, as Sfard and Prusak (2005) pointed out, have a reifying effect. For example, “I am an English Teacher” is an identity statement.

Where teacher efficacy and teacher identity begin to overlap is in the nuances in statements such as, “I am a good English teacher” and even, “I am a good English teacher because I am passionate about poetry” or “I am a good English teacher because I am passionate about poetry and have the ability to handle disruptive students easily.” These statements both reify identity beliefs and contain an implicit understanding of identity based on the teacher’s sense of their ability. A teacher’s sense of self-efficacy in this sense can be understood as an integral part of their teacher identity.

Second Language Teacher Identity, Efficacy, and Attrition

Building upon work done by theorists like Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk-Hoy and Hoy (1998), researchers have used teacher efficacy as a theoretical lens with which to examine second language teachers’ attrition rates (e.g., Atay, 2007; Swanson, 2010; 2012). Works by Swanson (2010; 2012) found clear, statistically significant links between second language teacher efficacy scores and attrition rates. The literature reveals, however, that language teachers’ sense of efficacy, like their identities, is not a singular construct (“I am a good English teacher”) but is both multi-faceted and contextually specific. Three important dimensions of self-efficacy in teacher identity correlate with a language teacher’s decision to remain within the profession, or to leave it. The first is a language teacher’s efficacy beliefs in their language proficiency (Steinbach & Zazarloga, 2014; Velez-Rendon, 2002; Wilbur, 2007). The second is their sense of efficacy in content pedagogy – or the belief in their ability to teach the language (Beauchamp & Thomas, 2009; Karsenti, Collin & Dumouchel, 2013; Swanson 2010, 2012; Velez-Rendon, 2002; Wilbur, 2007). Finally, attrition rates for language teachers seem to correlate strongly to their belief in their ability to manage a class (Karsenti, Collin & Dumouchel, 2013; Swanson, 2010, 2012).

These multiple facets of self-efficacy, while often overlapping, are distinct and can react differently so that a teacher can experience simultaneously different feelings of efficacy as a part of their teacher identity. For example, an ESL teacher may have a high sense of self-efficacy with regards to her ability to use the English language (language proficiency), but may experience lower efficacy in regards to her ability to resolve conflict within her classroom (classroom management). This is why it can be helpful to consider dimensions of teacher self-efficacy as a part of teacher identity as a whole, functioning as interdependent aspects of teacher identity, as demonstrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Second Langue Teacher Efficacy-Identity Source(s): Parks, 2017.
Figure 2: Second Langue Teacher Efficacy-Identity
Source(s): Parks, 2017.

 

The link between second language teacher attrition, identity and self-efficacy becomes clearer when we look at the complex act of teaching a language and break it down into these separate categories.

Dimension 1: Linguistic Proficiency

There are some important nuances in a second language teacher’s identity that differentiate language teachers from teachers of other subjects. One of these addresses what Vargese, Morgan, Johnson & Johnson (2005) identified as the contradictoryidentities that teachers hold. While negotiating the same tensions between personal and professional identities that other teachers experience (Pennington & Richards, 2016, p. 9), second language teachers often have another layer of identity to contend with, namely their status as either a so-called native (NES) or non-native (NNES) English speaker. The phenomenon of NNES versus NES teacher identities has been studied with great interest in second language education research (e.g., Steinbach & Kazarloga, 2014; Vargese et. al, 2005;), where nuances of status and hierarchy based on the language teacher’s native pronunciation influenced the teachers’ emerging professional identities.

In Steinbach and Kazarloga’s (2014) study, the implied elevated social and professional status of native English speaking teachers (NESTs) contributed to a disconnect between what students reported as their confidence in their linguistic ability and their dissatisfaction with their accent, “having a native-like pronounciation [sic] would improve my self-confident [sic]” (Steinbach & Kazarloga, 2014, p. 326). As we have already seen in this review, this idea of linguistic proficiency as a dimension of second language teacher identity is an important indicator of second language teacher attrition (Swanson, 2010, 2012).

The struggle that ESL teachers undergo in their quest to speak like a ‘native’ is also apparent in the work done by K. E. Johnson (1992) as reported by Vargese et al. (2005). In this study, Marc, a NNES, grappled with her multiple identities as a teacher-of-language and a learner-of-language learner. Her need to “be ahead of the students” (Vargese et al., 2005, p. 26) was a source of underlying tension which was only assuaged when she joined a professional group of non-native English-speaking teachers (NNESTs).

Both studies reveal how the multifaceted and contradictory aspects of a language teacher’s identity are connected to their identity as native or non-native speaker of English. The anxiety surrounding a language teacher’s NEST or NNEST in this study speaks directly to the teacher’s sense of efficacy in the dimension of language proficiency.

Linguistic proficiency and identity politics

A language teacher’s identity as a native or non-native speaker can be further complicated by their position within the culture and society in which they teach. Vargese et al. (2005) described this aspect of identity as “contextual and associated to specific social, cultural, and political pressures” (p. 23). The province of Quebec in Canada, where Steinbach and Kazarloga’s (2014) research was done, is an excellent example of how the intersection between linguistic identity and identity politics interact to pressure ESL teachers to perform their identity differently. In Quebec, language has historically been linked to political power and social status. After the Quiet Revolution of the 1960s, it became politically and socially important to assert one’s identity as Francophone. The political discourse of these identity politics continues to resonate in Quebec society. It is not surprising, therefore, that the ESL student teachers in Steinbach and Kazarloga’s (2014) research were “not prepared to sacrifice their identities in order to teach English because of their strong national identity in a political and linguistic context where their native language has more political and social status than English” (p. 331). The resulting conflict between ESL student teachers’ personal identities as Francophones and their professional identities as English-speaking ESL teachers, resulted in their contradictory and conflicting descriptions of their identities. It also causes them to “describe their cultural identity differently, depending on where they are or with whom they are speaking” (Steinbach & Kazarloga, 2014, p. 327). The tension created by maintaining contradictoryidentities might hold a key to the particular stress that language teachers experience and warrants further investigation if we are to understand why language teachers, more than others are prone to leave teaching prematurely.

Dimension 2: Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK)

Linguistic proficiency may be at the core of a language teacher’s identity, but the efficacy of pedagogical strategies and approaches that second language teachers use can also influence attrition rates (Swanson, 2010; 2012). In order to feel efficacious, a language teacher needs to be able to do more than use the language effectively, he or she must have confidence in his or her pedagogical content knowledge, or “what teachers know about teaching their particular subject matter… to make the subject matter comprehensible to students” (Velez-Rendon, 2002, p. 462). In other words, a language teacher must not only be able to use the language effectively, he or she must know what strategies to use in order to teach the language most effectively to students (Wilbur, 2007).

Swanson’s (2010) research into second language teacher attrition reveals links between a second language teacher’s sense of efficacy in the dimension of “pedagogical content knowledge” and the likelihood that he or she will remain or leave the profession. In his 2010 study, Swanson found a statistically significant correlation between a teacher’s sense of efficacy in helping students learn at the beginning stages of language learning—their belief in their ability to teach language acquisition—and the likelihood that they would stay (retention) or leave the teaching field.

Wilbur’s (2007) research into second language teacher education provides us with possible reasons for why linguistic proficiency, self-efficacy and teaching strategies might be connected. Although communicative methodologies of language instruction have long been considered more effective than rote-learning of grammar by second language educational researchers, many language teachers continue to use rote-learning as their primary educational approach. This may be because the communicative approach requires the teacher to create lessons that are designed to maximize interactions with students in the target language. As Wilbur explains, “because of their lack of proficiency, novice teachers shun more communicative methodologies and rely instead on traditional, grammar-focused teaching” (2007, p. 83, italics added). Here we see the same downward spiral in efficacy described earlier by Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk Hoy, and Hoy (1998). It begins when a language teacher, lacking confidence in his or her ability to use the target language, avoids the communicative approach in favour of ones that, while less effective, require less linguistic proficiency from the teacher and in which the teacher feels a higher sense of efficacy. This pedagogical choice results in less successful results for the students and decreases the teacher’s overall sense of efficacy as a language teacher. Again, the literature points to the downward spiral that occurs when second language teachers lack a sense of efficacy, not only in their linguistic proficiency, but also in their pedagogical subject matter knowledge.

General pedagogical skills that all teachers need such as “managing class time, giving clear directions, meeting students’ needs, and focusing on students rather than on the self are at once the most crucial skills for classroom success and the most difficult to acquire” (Velez-Rendon, 2002, p. 460). Effective classroom methodology for teaching language is easier when the students have basic proficiency in the language. On the contrary, when the students have little to no knowledge of the language, an understanding of language acquisition and effective teaching strategies are crucial. Looking at the literature globally, we see a portrait starting to emerge of a language teacher who, feeling unsure of their linguistic proficiency, selects more teacher centered and less successful pedagogical strategies, and in turn experiences decreased efficacy. The students in a language classroom who have a teacher with low self-efficacy experience less academic success (Velez-Rendon, 2002) and are more likely to act out their frustrations in class (Woolfolk, Rosoff & Hoy, 1990; Wilbur 2007). The resulting frustration between teacher and students brings us to the dimension of language teacher efficacy that is clearly linked to attrition: a teacher’s ability to manage their classroom successfully.

Dimension 3: Classroom Management

The final dimension of a language teacher’s efficacy-identity that has important links to attrition rates is their sense of mastery over classroom management. It will come as no surprise to anyone who has ever taught—or who has ever been a student in a class with a teacher who was struggling with classroom management—that a teacher’s sense of self-efficacy in this dimension is one of the most important determining factors in whether they will stay or leave the profession. Classroom management styles correlate to a teacher’s sense of instructional efficacy: teachers with a low sense of efficacy favour a custodial attitude and sanctions to control students’ behaviour. They are often “mired in classroom problems” (Woolfolk, Rosoff & Hoy, 1990, p.140). In contrast, teachers with a stronger sense of efficacy rely more often on persuasive, rather than authoritarian management strategies, and support development of students’ intrinsic interests (Bandura, 1997, p. 241). In much the same way that a language teacher’s sense of linguistic proficiency influences their methodological choices (such as the communicative method for teachers with a high sense of efficacy versus a grammar-based approach for teachers with a low sense of efficacy), Woolfolk, Rosoff, and Hoy’s (1990) work links a high sense of teacher efficacy to a more humanistic approach to classroom management. In other words, teachers who experienced high efficacy overall, had a more positive classroom climate where misbehaviour was less frequent and handled in more positive ways. In classrooms where teachers had low overall self-efficacy, they were more likely to describe the classroom situation in terms of conflict and control (Woolfolk, Rosoff, & Hoy, 1990).

What is true for classroom teachers in general is also true for second language teachers: Swanson’s (2012) research into attrition factors for second and foreign language teachers confirms that self-efficacy, classroom management and attrition are linked. In this study, the most statistically significant predictors for a second language teacher’s decision to remain or leave the teaching profession were their perceived confidence in the dimension of classroom management particularly in their ability to “(1) control disruptive behaviour in the classroom. . . .and (2) to calm a student who is disruptive or noisy” (p. 90). The dimension of classroom management in self-efficacy then is an essential place to start if we want to explore the problem of second language teacher attrition and how to prevent it.

Second Language Teacher Identity: A Strategic Choice?

One of the strategies that language teachers use when developing classroom management efficacy is, interestingly, to assume a particular kind of identity. In Pennington and Richard’s (2016) study into language teachers’ identity construction, the authors found that novice teachers who have not yet mastered the highly complex array of skills teaching requires tend to take on a “situated identity” (p. 7). The situated identity is more traditional and teacher centered. It requires that the teacher stand in front of the class and lead interactions, requiring students to raise their hands as a condition of interaction. Novice teachers in this situated identity are performing the role of teacher in a way that is recognized by institutions and culture (Gee, 2000), but that may not be coherent with the professional identity they wish to assume; it may not be authentic. Pennington and Richard suggested that this performance of situated identity might, in fact, be an effective strategy for novice language teachers. It functions as a kind of place-marker for the teachers’ professional identity while they gain experience and assurance in the classroom. The authors contrasted this kind of situated identity with a minority of novice teachers who assume a “more informal, personal and authentic identity,” which Pennington and Richard refer to as a “transposable identity” (p. 8). This transposable identity, far from being a strategic choice for novice teachers, may, in fact be disadvantageous since “such a teacher identity may be less effective for new teachers, who have not yet mastered instructional content and pedagogical skills” (p. 8). A “transposable identity,” they argued, is likely to lead to a breakdown in classroom management when students do not recognize their teacher’s authority. What Pennington and Richard’s research makes clear is that identity, and efficacy in the dimension of classroom management, are not only tightly linked, but that a particular kind of professional teaching identity becomes a strategic choice that novice language teachers need to make while they develop a sense of efficacy in the dimension of classroom management.

Implications for Second Language Teacher Education

Much research to date has focused on what we can do to prevent teachers from leaving once they are in the field (e.g., Ashiedu & Scott-Ladd, 2012; Johnson et al. 2010; Swanson 2012). However, the factors within the teaching field that appear to have the most impact over a teacher’s decision to stay or leave the profession – such as the diversity of school environments and working conditions (Ashiedu & Scott-Ladd, 2012) – are precisely those over which we have the least control. A more effective approach might be to address the problem where we can study it and control it before it starts in teacher education. Velez-Rendon’s (2002) review of research into language teacher education highlighted what she sees as a shortfall in what pre-service language teachers need to know regarding their subject matter, “language proficiency is crucial for effective teaching… unfortunately, a large number of foreign language programs fail to provide prospective teachers with acceptable proficiency levels” (p. 462). Steinbach and Karlova’s study (2014) has provided evidence of this failure of second language teacher education programs to ensure their teachers graduate with high levels of linguistic proficiency. They report that despite admission to second language teaching programs at two major universities in Quebec, more than 30% of their undergraduate teachers were unable to pass the speaking tasks on the Test of English for Language Teachers (TELT) on the first attempt, and a further 20% were unable to pass the writing section, even after two attempts (Steinbach & Kazarloga, 2014, p. 324). These tests were not administered as entrance exams, but were rather a requirement for graduation from the program. From the large percentage of students who were unable to pass portions of the test, even after two attempts, it appears that the teacher education program was failing to appropriately address the linguistic deficits of their students.

Second Language Teacher Education: Identity Formation

Pre-service second language teachers, like teachers of other subjects, do not come to second language teacher education as tabula rasa, but bring with them a nascent identity based on “their own experience of teacher-models (or anti-models)” (Velez-Rendon, 2002, p. 459). As a language teacher moves through the process of teacher education, their identity shifts in response to their experiences within the university and while on field placements. Beauchamp and Thomas (2009) describe this as “the inherent tension that exists for teachers as they navigate between personal and professional aspects of identity inherent within that of a teacher” (p. 177). In their study on undergraduate second language teachers in two universities in Quebec, Thomas and Beauchamp (2011) detailed how the teachers’ descriptions of their identities through metaphor undergo a shift, moving from concepts of teacher as a “nurturer or protector of students” towards the idea of “teacher as survivor” (p. 767). Before they had had any extended experience as teacher in the classroom, the student teachers approached the field with an anticipation of forming a meaningful connection with their students (Thomas & Beauchamp, 2011, p. 766). Their identities at this stage revolved around the theme of nurturer. Words like “guiding,” “mothering,” “protecting,” and “supporting” figured frequently in the metaphors they used to describe how they saw their role in the classroom (p. 765). After teaching in the field, Thomas and Beauchamp (2011) noticed an abrupt shift in the students’ identities: rather than describing their identities in terms of their relationship with their students, the student teachers were now focusing on themselves without much reference to the students. Metaphors now focused on the multidimensional aspects of identity that teachers needed to perform; words like “survival” and metaphors of turbulent or calm waters now appeared (p. 764). The concept of “survival” is a familiar one for most novice teachers and raises flags for any researcher interested in examining the question of teacher attrition. Research needs to look more closely at why students are merely surviving and teacher education should find ways to scaffold students’ education so that they thrive, rather than survive the field placements. Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk Hoy, and Hoy (1998) suggested a clear course of action:

Teacher preparation programs need to give preservice teachers more opportunities for actual experiences with instructing and managing children in a variety of contexts with increasing levels of complexity and challenge to provide mastery experiences and specific feedback. An apprenticeship approach—whereby the complex task of teaching is broken down into its elements and an apprentice teacher is allowed to work on developing one set of skills at a time—should encourage a compounding sense of efficacy over various contexts and skills. Performance feedback (verbal persuasion) early in learning that highlights the positive achievements of the apprentice teacher and that encourages emphasis on attributions that are controllable and variable (e.g., effort and persistence) will have a positive effect on the development of efficacy beliefs. Assigning novice teachers smaller classes and more capable students in their first year should enhance efficacy. (p. 235)

Although these suggestions were made more than two decades ago, second language teacher education, like teacher education in general, has been slow to adopt these recommendations.

Conclusions and Discussion

This literature review began with the intention of considering the problem of second language teacher attrition by finding the answers to two research questions; first, what does the literature tell us about the possible causes of second language teacher attrition? Second, what are the possible links between second language teacher attrition, efficacy and identity? Upon reviewing the literature, we have seen that second language teacher attrition can be linked to self-efficacy and that efficacy can be understood as a facet of teacher identity. Research has shown that three dimensions of what I now term second language teacher “efficacy-identity” are statistically significant factors in second language teacher attrition:

  1. linguistic proficiency (Beauchamp & Thomas, 2009; Steinbach & Kazarloga, 2014; Swanson 2010, 2012; Wilbur, 2007);
  2. pedagogical content knowledge (Karsenti et al., 2008; Kutsuyruba et al., 2014; Thomas & Beauchamp, 2011; Velez-Rendon, 2002; Wilbur, 2007); and
  3. classroom management (Karsenti, et al., 2008; Kutsuyruba et al., 2014; Swanson 2012).

In answer to the second question, there are several conclusions we can draw from the literature about connections between identity and efficacy for second language teachers: first, we can understand from this review that a second-language teacher’s sense of self-efficacy is an integral part of their professional identity. Next, the literature has shown that language teacher’s self-efficacy is not a singular dimension of their identity, but, like teacher identity itself, is multiple: it shifts and manifests differently depending on the skill and context which the teacher is being asked to perform at a given moment. For example, a language teacher might experience a high degree of efficacy in using and teaching in the target language (linguistic proficiency) with an advanced group of students, but the same teacher may experience low efficacy in pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) when trying to explain to beginner students how to acquire the language effectively and become discouraged.

The further we explore the concepts of teacher identity and efficacy in the field of second language teaching, the more we discover how integrally they are linked, and how complex and multiple these identities are. Steinbach and Kazarloga’s (2014) study helps us to see the political and linguistic pressures that are unique to language teachers’ nascent professional identities, which cause them to experience contradictory and even conflicting identities, particularly in their understanding of their own linguistic abilities. The political discourse surrounding language and identity that are inherent in the act of teaching language engender further layers of social and political pressure to perform certain identities that aren’t present for teachers in other subjects and which may be a source of supplemental stress and tension that could account for the increased attrition rates for second language teachers. Thomas and Beauchamp’s (2011) study into the idea of survival so prevalent in pre-service teachers’ descriptions of their own identities also provides us with an entry point into understanding how novice teachers frame their professional identity and how it is formed.

Suggestions for Further Research

Based on the results of this literature review, it would appear that if we are really to understand the underlying causes for second language teacher attrition, we need to better understand second language teacher efficacy (SLTE) and how it is developed. Many second language education researchers agree that second language teacher (SLT) education programs are not doing enough to make pre-service teachers feel effective (e.g., Liston, Whitcomb & Borko, 2006; Velez-Rendon, 2002; Wilbur, 2007). Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk Hoy, and Hoy (1998) suggest longitudinal studies across teacher preparation programs and across the first several years in the field to map the development of efficacy beliefs. Experimental studies looking into pre-service teacher identity formation – particularly in the three dimensions of SLTE “efficacy-identity” identified by the literature (1. linguistic proficiency; 2. pedagogical content knowledge; and 3. classroom management) could also go a long way to helping SLT educators understand what teaching experiences and conditions help pre-service second language teacher increase their overall resilience before entering the field.

Comparative studies of graduating cohorts of SLTs from different SLT education programs could help us to identify which programs produce language teachers with higher senses of efficacy. We could then examine the course content and pedagogical strategies of the programs that graduate teachers with a high sense of efficacy in order to identify ‘best practices’ SLT education programs.

Researchers looking into the problem of second language teacher attrition also need to continue their examination into efficacy and attrition. Currently, SLTE is a strong predictor of teachers’ intention to stay or leave the profession (Swanson, 2012), but a statistical study linking attrition rates to efficacy—perhaps through survival analysis of graduating cohorts with stronger or weaker senses of efficacy—would strengthen the connections between efficacy, identity and attrition.

References

Ashiedu, J. A., & Scott-Ladd, B. D. (2012). Understanding teacher attraction and retention drivers: Addressing teacher shortages. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(11), 17-35.

Ashton, P. T. (1985). Motivation and the teacher’s sense of efficacy. Research on motivation in education, 2, 141-174.

Atay, D. (2007). Beginning teacher efficacy and the practicum in an EFL context. Teacher Development, 11(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530701414720

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman, New York.

Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252

Borman, G. D., & Dowling, N. M. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 367–409. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321455

Clark, R., & Antonelli, F. (2009). Why teachers leave: Results of an Ontario survey 2006-08. Ontario Teachers’ Federation.

Gee, J. P. (2000). Chapter 3: Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of research in education, 25(1), 99-125.

Hoy, A., & Spero, R. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007

Ingersoll, & Strong. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323

Karsenti, T., Collin, S., & Dumouchel, G. (2013). Le décrochage enseignant : État des connaissances. International Review of Education, 59(5), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-013-9367-z

Kutsyuruba, B., Godden, L., & Tregunna, L. (2013). Early-Career Teacher Attrition and Retention: A pan-Canadian document analysis study of teacher induction and mentorship programs.

Pennington, M., & Richards, J. (2016). Teacher identity in language teaching: Integrating personal, contextual, and professional factors. RELC Journal, 47(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631219

Sachs, J. (2005) Teacher education and the development of professional identity: Learning to be a teacher. In Kompf, M., & Denicolo, P. (Eds.). Connecting policy and practice: Challenges for teaching and learning in schools and universities. Routledge.

Sfard, A. & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: in search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34 (4), 14–22.

Smith, T. M., & Ingersoll, R. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover?. American educational research journal, 41(3), 681-714.

Swanson, P. (2012). Second/foreign language teacher efficacy and its relationship to professional attrition. The Canadian Modern Language Review / La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 68(1), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.68.1.078

Swanson, P. B. (2010). Teacher efficacy and attrition: Helping students at introductory levels of language instruction appears critical. Hispania, 93(2), 305-321.

Steinbach, M., & Kazarloga, V. (2014). Square-headed frogs and world citizens: Attitudes and identities of ESL teacher candidates in Québec. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 13(5), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2014.958038

Thomas, L., & Beauchamp, C. (2011). Understanding new teachers’ professional identities through metaphor. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 762–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.007

Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of educational research, 68(2), 202-248.

Vargese, M., Morgan, B., Johnson, B., Johnson, K. (2005) Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 4(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0401_2

Vélez‐Rendón, G. (2002). Second language teacher education: A review of the literature. Foreign Language Annals, 35(4), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb01884.x

Wilbur, M. L. (2007). How foreign language teachers get taught: Methods of teaching the methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 79-101.

Woolfolk, A., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. (1990). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(90)90031-Y

Identity as a Research Lens in Science and Physics Education

Volume 1(1): 2017

CHRIS GOSLING, McGill University

ABSTRACT

Gender research in physics education has traditionally focused on studying learning differences between males and females, understanding how to present content in a way that is more accessible for females, or uncovering explanations for observed differences in engagement with physics (e.g., Hazari, Sonnert, Sadler, & Shanahan, 2010; Kost, Pollock, & Finkelstein, 2009). Recent work in Physics Education Research (PER) calls for an epistemological shift (Traxler, Cid, Blue, & Barthelemy, 2016) in research concerning gender, one that focuses on the complex and intersectional nature of student learning as gendered identity formation within the culture of school science. This shift is necessary because the traditional approaches to gender research within the Physics Education Research community of practice cannot account for the contextual nature of gender nor its intersection with other factors. The science education community has much to offer in this regard, having developed and applied identity formation as an analytical tool (e.g., Carlone & Johnson, 2007). The aim of this critical literature review is to present a survey of the relevant literature that investigates how identity is employed by researchers and how its use can help move gender research in physics beyond a binary perspective of gender.

RÉSUMÉ

Les recherches sur le genre et l’égalité des sexes en didactique de la physique se sont traditionnellement attardées à l’étude des différences dans les apprentissages entre les garçons et les filles, comprendre comment les enseignants peuvent présenter les contenus de sorte que ces derniers soient plus accessibles chez les filles, ou découvrir des raisons expliquant les différences observées dans l’engagement des femmes en physique (Hazari, Sonnert, Sadler, et Shanahan, 2010 ; Kost, Pollock, et Finkelstein, 2009). De récentes recherches en didactique de la physique (RDP) suggèrent une transition épistémologique (Traxler, Cid, Blue, et Barthelemy, 2016) dans les études sur sur le genre, une qui met l’accent sur la nature complexe et intersectionnelle sur l’apprentissage des élèves puisque la formation de l’identité genrée et sexuée fait partie de la culture scientifique à l’école. Cette transition est nécessaire étant donné que les approches traditionnelles dans les études sur le genre dans la communauté professionnelle des pratiques enseignantes en didactique de la physique ne peuvent pas tenir pour acquis la nature contextuelle de l’égalité des sexes ni les intersections avec d’autres facteurs. La communauté des chercheurs en didactique des sciences a beaucoup à offrir à cet égard puisqu’ils ont développé et utilisé la formation identitaire comme outil d’analyse (Carlone et Johnson, 2007). Le but de cette recension des écrits critique est de présenter un sondage des écrits pertinents s’intéressant à démontrer comment l’identité est employée par les chercheurs et comment son utilisation peut soutenir d’autres études en physique au-delà de la perspective binaire du genre.

Keywords: Identity, gender, physics, science, education.

INTRODUCTION

Despite decades of concern about female representation in the physical sciences, physics lags behind the other sciences in both the recruitment and retention of women to postsecondary degree programs in Canada, the United States, and internationally (Francis et al., 2016). The demographics of physicists do not reflect those of the wider population; for example, in the United States, only 20% of bachelor’s degrees are currently awarded to women (Statistical Research Center | American Institute of Physics, 2017). This lack of progress is particularly significant given the efforts of scholars whose focus on gender issues within physics education research (PER) has endeavored to uncover ways to bring more women into the field and keep them there (see discussion in Traxler, Cid, Blue, & Barthelemy, 2016).

Gender research in PER has traditionally focused on studying learning differences between male and female students, understanding how to present content in a way that is more accessible for women, or uncovering explanations for observed differences in engagement with physics (e.g., Hazari, Sonnert, Sadler, & Shanahan, 2010; Kost-Smith et al., 2010). These related threads of inquiry have produced a detailed picture of these learning differences, but by their nature cannot capture the nuances of students’ experiences in physics and how they relate to the field. Gender research in PER has also traditionally considered “female” students as a uniform category defined in relation to their male counterparts. This approach positions female students as deficient when compared to their male counterparts (Traxler et al., 2016) and also prohibits a deeper exploration of how students, with a spectrum of gender identities, engage with and experience physics.

The limitations outlined above plague the majority of existing gender studies in PER. To address these shortcomings, scholars have called for an epistemological shift (Traxler et al., 2016) in research on gender, one that focuses on the complex and intersectional nature of student learning as gendered identity formation within the culture of school science. In addition, we must carefully consider how gender is categorised to avoid reinforcing gendered inequalities of power (Francis & Paechter, 2015). These shifts are needed because the traditional approaches to gender research within the PER community cannot account for the contextual nature of gender nor its intersection with other factors (May, 2012). Science education researchers have much to offer in this regard, having developed and applied identity formation as an analytical tool (e.g., Carlone & Johnson, 2007).

This critical literature review will first discuss the motivation for using identity as a research lens in PER. I will then compare and contrast how identity has been conceptualized and mobilized in the study of science and physics education in recent studies. Finally, this review will consider the potentially illuminating lessons in the way that these researchers conceive and deploy identity as a theoretical lens in their work.

WHY DO WE NEED IDENTITY?

A Sociocultural Perspective

In his 2001 article, Lemke describes the sociocultural perspective on science education as “viewing science, science education, and research on science education as human social activities conducted within institutional and cultural frameworks” (p. 296). Accordingly, a sociocultural approach to science education research does not consider science learning to be a stand-alone process, but rather an activity which is intricately connected to students’ lives outside of school. Lemke notes that, “students’ beliefs, attitudes, values, and personal identities” are all critical to their success in learning science (p. 305). How then, could a research approach focused solely on cognitive gains or differences between different groups of learners, hope to capture the complexity of students’ experiences? The answer, of course, is that it cannot. The process of learning science as it is currently taught frequently requires students to surrender facets of their personal identity and some of the bonds that they share with their community (Lemke, 2001). This process is most problematic for students who do not fit the dominant paradigm of a physicist—that is to say, anyone who is not white, cisgender (gender identity matching their birth sex), male, able-bodied, and heterosexual. While some non-dominant students reject these concessions and maintain their connections to their cultures and communities, in doing so, they run the risk of failing in science. A cognitive approach to understanding the process of learning science would deem these students as “unsuccessful”, but a sociocultural approach might shed light on the disconnect between the cultures of home and school while demonstrating that there are confounding influences that affect student learning. The construct of identity, in particular, is aptly suited to investigating such complex interdependencies between cultures, community, and learning.

What is identity?

Though a literature review of this nature does not require the development of a theoretical framework, it is worth defining what researchers mean when they use the term identity. Brickhouse (2001) described the process of learning as “not merely a matter of acquiring knowledge, it is a matter of deciding what kind of person you are and want to be and engaging in those activities that make one a part of the relevant communities” (p. 286). She refers to this this act of deciding what kind of person you are and want to be as identity formation. Similarly, Gee (2000) defined identity as being recognized as a certain “kind of person” (p. 99) at a given time and place. Taken together, we arrive at a working definition of identity as: the sum of one’s beliefs about oneself, one’s actions, and how one’s behavior is interpreted by others in a given context.

A note on poststructuralist terminology

Before delving into a review of recent research in science and physics education that uses identity as an analytical lens, I will pause to explain two terms that poststructuralist researchers commonly employ when talking about identity and student learning: positioning and performativity.

Positioning is used to describe the act of putting one’s self or someone else into a particular stance, most frequently during a verbal exchange or conversation (Davies & Harré, 1990). With a specific eye toward group work in physics, Berge and Danielsson (2013) wrote that “positioning is always twofold; a positioning of someone else also implies a positioning of oneself, and moreover, people can both position themselves (reflexive positioning) and position others (interactive positioning) in a conversation” (p. 1181). Consider as an example a comment that I might make while working in a small group comparing the approach a fellow group member employed to solve a problem to that I used. By voicing this aloud, I am simultaneously putting myself into a particular role (“thorough checker,” for example) and positioning my peer in a certain way (“rapid problem solver,” perhaps). It is important to note that the range of positions available during a conversation is not infinite. Though a small group of three to four students working together is itself a form of cultural production (Carlone, Johnson, & Eisenhart, 2014), the function of this group of students and the roles that each one assumes are modulated by larger discourses, such as the classroom culture, the school community, and the larger physics community as a whole.

Performativity is a term that is used to describe how individuals perform a certain role in a given context. In her writings on the nature of gender, Judith Butler (1999) wrote that performativity is “repetition and a ritual, which achieves its effects through its naturalization in the context of a body, understood, in part, as a culturally sustained temporal duration” (p. xv). That is to say, performativity refers to how a person acts in ways that lead others to view them as a certain kind of person. These acts are sustained and ongoing and, for many, unconscious ways of fulfilling expected roles. Therefore, if someone is described as performing a male gender, they think of themselves as male, act in ways that they consider to be compatible with a male gender, and are recognized as having a male gender in that context. Notice that none of these elements are related to a person’s sex—a performative perspective of gender rejects the binary female/male definition completely.

It is important to note that the idea of performativity is not limited to gender and can be applied to different facets of our identities. For example, students can perform “good student” identities by acting in ways that meet the expectations that others might have for how good students should act. Finally, performativity can change based on one’s situation. For instance, the way that one performs a “good student” identity might change dependent on one’s academic course given that different teachers have differing expectations and definitions of what it means to be a good student.

Learning as Identity Formation

Understanding learning as a form of identity construction is a particularly rich approach because “it accounts for the importance of both individual agency as well as societal structures that constrain individual possibilities” (Brickhouse, 2001, p. 286). As such, the concept of identity enables researchers to determine the cause for a student’s difficulty in learning, whether because they are having difficulty grasping the information being presented or because the difficulty stems from a conflict between how a student views themselves and how they are expected to behave in class. Brickhouse (2001) provides a poignant example:

Thus a girl who is silent in science class may well be acting in this way because she aspires to be a good girl student. . . . It may be the case that a student will decide that she has no desire to be a part of the communities at school that are engaged in school science. Perhaps she finds what they do to be boring and irrelevant to her own concerns. Or perhaps she finds the other members of the community to be simply obnoxious. She chooses disengagement and ignorance in the process of deciding that she does not desire membership into school science communities. (p. 287)

In using identity as a theoretical construct, we are better able to understand student learning; it is not sufficient to say that students are or are not learning; we must aim to understand the reasons why students are learning the way that they are.

Carlone and Johnson (2007) made a compelling case for using identity to study the learning of science. They noted that existing approaches fall flat when attempting to determine why some students do not persist in science despite their qualifications to do so (Carlone & Johnson, 2007). The obvious response is that there is something about these students that is at odds with the way that they are being taught science—perhaps it is something in their backgrounds, the way they experience the courses, or the roles that they must take on in order to be successful within the culture of school science. Carlone and Johnson (2007) also highlighted how traditional approaches to studying the learning of science fail to account for students’ agency and are generally static;that is, such approaches consider factors that modulate student learning to be discrete variables, rather than allowing for a wide spectrum of responses. After chronicling the limitations of past studies of science learning, they offered identity as an alternative. This allows for accounts of structure and agency, for a performative view of gender and race, and for flexibility to be applied across large time scales and in variable contexts (Carlone & Johnson, 2007). These scholars developed a model for identity to better understand their data; I discuss this model later in this review.

A more recent call for the use of identity in science education research comes from Traxler, Cid, Blue, and Barthelemy (2016), who highlighted identity as a possible way forward for gender research in physics education given its flexibility. In particular, as a research lens, identity is not limited by a binary definition of gender; rather, it understands gender to be performative and contextual. That is to say, Traxler and her collaborators assumed a Butlerian approach to gender, describing how it is both performed and interpreted, and pointing out that the way that one’s gender is performed and interpreted depends on context. Finally, Traxler et al. (2016) noted that identity also has the potential to account for the intersection of gender with additional factors such as race or ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and sexual orientation. Given the dearth of studies examining the confluence of such factors concerning gender in PER, this appears to be an area where the use of identity as a research lens would enable substantial gains by allowing researchers to produce a more comprehensive and nuanced picture of how students engage with physics.

EXISTING RESEARCH USING IDENTITY

A Model of Science Identity Formation: Competence, Performance, and Recognition

In their research, Carlone and Johnson (2007) created a novel model of science identity formation to understand how the experiences of their participants with science, over time, contributed to different elements of their science identities. Their definition of identity operationalizes the sociocultural definition offered by Gee (2000). Carlone and Johnson’s model maintains three facets of identity: competence, performance, and recognition; all must exist for students to fully form science identities. Competence refers to being proficient in practices that are relevant to the one’s context (a physics classroom, for example), performance refers to demonstrating this competence, and recognition refers to others perceiving this performance as credible. In the context of a physics class, these facets might look like a student having the ability to solve a particular problem, doing so in a way that their teacher can observe their work, and the teacher then confirming the suitability of their solution.

Carlone and Johnson found that the development of students’ science identities was, at times, severely hampered by their interactions with established members of the field, who did not provide the positive recognition critical for the formation of full-fledged science identities. This unconscious behavior may have occurred because the students’ performance of their competence did not meet their professor’s expectations. This is not to say that the performances were lacking, but rather, that they did not have the expected form. For example, describing a scientific idea accurately, but using different language than that common to the field, might have prevented some faculty members from recognizing their explanation as accurate.

Carlone and Johnson’s (2007) study is of critical importance, not only because it successfully utilized identity as a research lens, but also because it illuminated three essential elements that are crucial to students’ identity formation. This is particularly meaningful because if students do not form science identities, they are unlikely to be successful in their science courses and will subsequently not pursue careers in the field. Carlone and Johnson’s study also highlighted recognition as a crucial component of identity formation, which, in turn, directly impacts student learning given that an incomplete science identity may prevent students from fully engaging with science content as insiders.

Secondary Students’ Physics Identity Formation

While previous research suggests that female students are less likely to view themselves as physics people than male students, a recent study determined that students’ gendered perceptions of identity are mutable (Hazari et al., 2013; Hazari, Sonnert, Sadler, & Shanahan, 2010). In their work, Hazari et al. (2010, 2013) found that discussions about the under-representation of women in physics held a particular power to positively affect students’ physics’ identities.

Lock and Hazari’s later research (2016) built on these findings when they focused on a single classroom where discussions about the under-representation of women in physics were being conducted to investigate the impact that these discussions had on student thinking. This study concluded that these discussions offered an opportunity for students to change their views of who can be a physicist and what being a physicist entails. It also revealed that this shift can, in turn, change the way students interpret their science experiences and can also impact their physics identity and career aspirations. It is crucial to note that the shifts in student thinking occurred not only for “female” students but also for “male” students, which indicates the potential for such discussions to gradually transform the culture of physics to be a more accepting space.

Forms of competence

Gonsalves (2014) used identity as a tool to examine how students modify their behaviors or pursue different ways to demonstrate competence within the cultural norms of physics. As viewed through the lens of identity, her data “revealed two predominant ways of being recognized as a physicist: demonstrating one or more of three main types of competence (analytical, technical and academic competence); and by performing stereotypical physicist behaviour” (p. 509). These themes of competence and performance connect directly to Carlone and Johnson’s (2007) model of identity formation and further enhance it. In this case, the use of identity as a lens allowed Gonsalves to demonstrate that the competence required for students to form physics identities might assume different modes and still be recognizable by established members of the field. Her work additionally demonstrates how students modified their behavior in response to their experiences of the physics culture.

Recognition: The Role of Teachers in Secondary Students’ Science Identity Formation

Hazari, Brewe, Goertzen, and Hodapp’s (2017) study focused on factors that affect how high school students form physics identities. The researchers collected quantitative data from a large Likert-scale survey (n=962) that asked female undergraduate students to report how they viewed themselves; there were similarly asked to assess how they were positioned by their peers and by their teacher (p. 97). The students’ responses showed that recognition by high school teachers was particularly important for the formation of a physics identity for girls in high school (Hazari et al., 2017). This finding is a linchpin in the field because it demonstrates the significant influence these teachers maintain in impacting their students’ physics identity development—many teachers are ignorant of the extent to which their recognition (or lack thereof) impacts female students. Hazari et al. (2017) also found that high school is a particularly fruitful time during students’ development for them to receive positive recognition. However, Hazari et al. also noted that further research is needed to determine what counts as meaningful recognition and how the recognition can be transmitted to students. I wondered about this final aspect as I read her work, curious if the recognition must happen verbally, and in person. Or, could the recognition be transmitted using other media, such as comments and feedback on written assignments (e.g., homework or journals) or even responses to students’ posts on an electronic discussion board?

Performance: Pedagogical Approaches and Identity Disruption

The role of the teacher in a student’s physics identity formation is not limited to recognition alone; pedagogical approaches are also a key component in helping students see themselves as physics people. Carlone’s (2004) research into reformed teaching methods that endeavored to engage students in their own learning and encouraged them to think about what it means “to ‘do science’ and ‘be a science person'” (p. 393) provided clear insights into why student learning was not as successful as anticipated. Carlone’s study used the concept of identity to understand the experiences that students, with similar backgrounds, had in a novel high school physics course. Identity emerged as a construct that determines what sort of behaviors are valued within a learning environment and what kinds of roles are available for particular students to assume (pp. 396-397). The reformed teaching methods, provided by the teacher in Carlone’s study, disrupted student identity formation because they valued different modes of class participation than previous courses. This change in teaching style endangered the good student identities that students, especially female students, had cultivated in previous science courses and triggered crises for some students as they struggled to position themselves around this new way of doing science. The progressive pedagogical approach used in this course impacted students’ physics identity formation, which, in turn, affected their learning. Using identity as a theoretical lens allowed Carlone to understand their resistance to the reformed course in ways that would not have been possible otherwise.

Societal Impact of Physics as a Gendered Construct on Secondary Students

While teachers maintain influence over pedagogical approaches and their recognition given to students within the classroom, societal pressures outside the school must also be considered when looking at how physics identities are formed. Archer, Moote, Francis, DeWitt, and Yeomans’ (2016) research investigated the identity work done by girls enrolled in a variety of secondary schools across England over a ten-year period. Their longitudinal approach to understanding identity formation examined how the way society considers physics to be a masculine domain prevented girls from identifying with the field. The researchers understood gender and classroom behaviors to be performative in nature and they also mobilized the concepts of habitus and capital (Bourdieu, 1986) to examine the ways in which the students interacted with physics (Archer et al., 2016) in light of their previous experiences outside of class. The data collected indicated a strong influence from mainstream culture on the roles that were available for girls to play and about the suitability of males for careers in physics. Identity was a useful lens in this case because it provided insights into how students positioned themselves relative to physics and the degree to which they maintained their femininity while participating in physics. This is a particularly important study because it examined secondary students’ positioning around physics relative to gender, which is a topic that had not been widely explored before this work was published. Further, it is significant because, rather than looking at differences between girls and boys learning physics, it looked for variations within the group of students categorised as girls to see what enabled some students to succeed in forming physics identities.

Gendered Roles in the Physics Laboratory

Western culture’s larger understanding of physics as a masculine field is replicated within the micro-culture of the laboratory. Danielsson’s (2012) study found that, while each unique, individual student’s identity is molded and constrained by the norms of the field. Even in cases where her participants positioned themselves outside the stereotypical positions available, the participants were still comparing their own identities against those available to them in physics. Much like Archer et al. (2016), Danielsson (2012) conceptualized gender as performative but noted that these performances are constrained by the context within which one works. She wrote, “not only are the female physics students relating to masculine norms of the discipline, they may also have to deal with the norms and expectations about how a woman is supposed to be in a physics and engineering context” (p. 36). This passage illustrates how Danielsson’s use of identity as a theoretical lens makes apparent the subtle ways that student identities are produced within and in opposition to the culture of physics.

Science Identity Trajectories

Like Archer et al. (2016), Jackson and Seiler (2013) also used identity as a lens to study students’ positioning with regard to science. Rather than focusing on gender, however, they used identity to explore the trajectories of non-traditional science students at a CEGEP institution in Montréal, which spans the traditional divide between high school and university (Jackson, 2014; Jackson & Seiler, 2013). These researchers looked at how latecomers — those students who arrive in physics after an atypical academic trajectory — learn science, and how they position themselves relative to the field.

The most significant result of Jackson and Seiler’s (2013) research was the creation of a new model of identity trajectory that captures students’ science identities over time. These scholars looked at how students positioned themselves, and others, while they did identity work and found that students’ science trajectories can be disrupted by the cultural models of learning present in most science classrooms. In this instance, the use of identity as an analytic lens allowed the researchers to view the latecomers who participated in the study not just as students who struggled, but as students whose ways of learning and past experiences were incongruent with the approaches that their instructors used to currently teach them science. This created a conflict between the identities that students narrated for themselves and the identities available within science. This finding can be extended to gender research–students whose ways of learning do not fit the dominant paradigms of school science are likely to struggle to form science identities, and in turn, to learn science. From this perspective, the theoretical lens of identity produced valuable insights into the connections between instructional methods and the likelihood that students will continue their studies of science.

CONCLUSIONS

The studies highlighted above demonstrate the variety of ways in which identity can be used as a theoretical lens to produce novel insights into how students learn physics and science. In particular, this review has shown that an identity lens allows us to understand that issues with student learning are not limited to difficulties with content, but can also stem from an incompatibility between how students view themselves and the modes of behavior and learning that are expected within their physics classrooms. Carlone and Johnson’s (2007) model for identity formation set the foundation for identity work by identifying competence, performance, and recognition as elements crucial to women of colour studying science at the university level. Other researchers have built upon this model, showing that multiple types of competence can garner positive recognition (Gonsalves, 2014) and that recognition is particularly important, especially for girls at the secondary level (Hazari et al., 2017).

Furthermore, Lock and Hazari (2016) found that conversations about the under-representation of women in physics have the potential to change the way students think of the field of physics and their own place in it. Both mainstream culture and the culture of physics itself constrain the gendered roles that are possible for students to assume (Archer et al., 2016). Non-dominant students struggle to create identities against the norms of the culture of physics in an effort to maintain the way they see themselves (Danielsson, 2012). Finally, the methods that instructors use in their classrooms can have a massive impact on students whose ways of learning do not align with their instructors’ expectations. Students actively resist such changes when their good student identities are threatened (Carlone, 2004) and can end up on outbound trajectories from physics if they are not allowed to perform their competence and engage with the content (Jackson, 2014; Jackson & Seiler, 2013).

Taken as a whole, these studies present a wide variety in the ways that identity can be used to study how students learn science and physics. It is clear that, as a theoretical lens, identity allows for a consideration of aspects of student learning that are not possible with more traditional models. For example, the binary approach to gender precludes any mention of students who do not meet the female/male binary, and also positions female students as lesser than their male peers. Identity does not have the same sort of limitation, as it allows for a wide spectrum of gender to emerge. It also allows researchers the opportunity to look for variations within a given category rather than comparing categories of students against one another. Further, identity is a flexible lens, useful for examining the intersection of multiple facets of student identity simultaneously. For example, Carlone and Johnson (2007) showed that it could be used to understand the experiences of women of colour, who engage in the practices of science differently from both white women and men of colour. For the multiple reasons outlined above, identity holds tremendous potential as a research lens. It is well-suited to a wide range of research undertaken from the socio-cultural perspective and permits researchers to ask difficult questions about how students engage with science and physics.

NEXT STEPS

Given the current position into which physics places non-dominant students, it would seem imperative that action be taken to redress the imbalance. Hopefully, physics education would open dialogue with students about the under-representation of women in physics, which, as Lock and Hazari (2016) demonstrated, positively affects students’ physics identities and increases the likelihood that they might enter the field. However, the precise types of changes that may occur in students’ thinking and identities during these discussions have not been established. In addition, while recognition of students’ competence is a critical element of their physics identity formation, the forms that this recognition may take and the frequency with which it need occur are not well known. Though the interplay between students’ backgrounds and the modes of teaching employed by their instructors has been documented, this area also warrants further investigation with respect to other intersectional aspects of their identities, such as socio-economic class. Finally, much of the data that has been generated by these studies relies on students’ beliefs and intentions about whether or not they will continue to study physics in the future. A fruitful line of inquiry would be to follow secondary students in a long-term study to determine whether or not they follow through with their intentions.

Despite the researchers’ varied lines of inquiries, this review has demonstrated that identity is a research lens well worth considering. The construct of identity allows scholars to ask difficult questions about the nuanced aspects of non-dominant students’ experiences with physics. Hopefully the answers they find will enable us to improve the way that physics is taught and change the culture of physics so that future students see a place for themselves in it.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I am indebted to my supervisor, Allison Gonsalves, for helping me select the topic for this analysis and for her guidance during the writing process. I am also grateful for the careful reading done by Philippa Parks and for her many useful suggestions. I also wish to acknowledge the helpful contributions of Bronwen Low, Ying-Syuan (Elaine) Huang, and Marta Kobiela, who provided feedback on an early version of this manuscript.

REFERENCES

Archer, L., Moote, J., Francis, B., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2016). The “exceptional” physics girl: A sociological analysis of multimethod data from young women aged 10-16 to explore gendered patterns of post-16 participation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 88–126.

Berge, M., & Danielsson, A. T. (2013). Characterising learning interactions: A study of university students solving physics problems in groups. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1177-1196.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), R. Nice (Trans.), Handbook of

theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 46–58). New York, NY: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<282::AID-TEA1006>3.0.CO;2-0

Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.

Carlone, H. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20006

Carlone, H., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237

Carlone, H., Johnson, A., & Eisenhart, M. (2014). Cultural perspectives in science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (2nd edition) (pp. 651–670). New York, NY: Routledge.

Danielsson, A. T. (2012). Exploring woman university physics students “doing gender” and “doing physics.” Gender and Education, 24(1), 25–39.

Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.

Francis, B., Archer, L., Moote, J., DeWitt, J., MacLeod, E., & Yeomans, L. (2016). The construction of physics as a quintessentially masculine subject: Young people’s perceptions of gender issues in access to physics. Sex Roles, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0669-z

Francis, B., & Paechter, C. (2015). The problem of gender categorisation: Addressing dilemmas past and present in gender and education research. Gender and Education, 27(7), 776–790.

Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.

Gonsalves, A. J. (2014). “Physics and the girly girl—there is a contradiction somewhere”: Doctoral students’ positioning around discourses of gender and competence in physics. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(2), 503–521.

Hazari, Z., Brewe, E., Goertzen, R. M., & Hodapp, T. (2017). The importance of high school physics teachers for female students’ physics identity and persistence. The Physics Teacher, 55(2), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4974122

Hazari, Z., Sadler, P. M., & Sonnert, G. (2013). The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 82–91.

Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363

Jackson, P. A. (2014). Better late than never? Identity work, trajectories, and persistence of latecomers to science (Doctoral dissertation). McGill University. Retrieved from eScholarship@McGill. (PID 121398)

Jackson, P. A., & Seiler, G. (2013). Science identity trajectories of latecomers to science in college. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 826–857.

Kost, L. E., Pollock, S. J., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2009). Characterizing the gender gap in introductory physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 5(1), 10101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010101

Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R

Lock, R. M., & Hazari, Z. (2016). Discussing underrepresentation as a means to facilitating female students’ physics identity development. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 20101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020101

May, V. M. (2012). Intersectionality. In C. M. Orr, A. Braithwaite, & D. Lichtenstein (Eds.), Rethinking women’s and gender studies. New York, NY: Routledge.

Statistical Research Center | American Institute of Physics. (2017). Representation of Women Among Physics Bachelors and PhDs | American Institute of Physics. Retrieved April 11, 2017, from https://www.aip.org/statistics/physics-trends/representation-women-among-physics-bachelors-and-phds

Traxler, A. L., Cid, X. C., Blue, J., & Barthelemy, R. (2016). Enriching gender in physics education research: A binary past and a complex future. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 20114.

Les représentations sociales sur les langues d’élèves de la fin de l’élémentaire en contexte francophone minoritaire

Volume 1(1): 2017

JOËL THIBEAULT, Université de Regina

CAROLE FLEURET, Université d’Ottawa

 

RÉSUMÉ

Cet article présente les résultats d’une étude de cas multiples menée auprès de huit élèves scolarisés en français à la fin du cours élémentaire dans le sud-ouest de l’Ontario et décrit, d’une part, les représentations sociales sur les langues qu’ils se sont construites et, de l’autre, les liens que ces représentations entretiennent avec le développement de leur compétence à accorder les verbes en nombre à l’écrit. Les résultats montrent que les participants détiennent tous des représentations positives à l’égard des langues et du plurilinguisme ; pour cette raison, il est difficile de poser des hypothèses viables vis-à-vis de leur influence sur l’accord verbal. Dans la discussion, nous abordons la mission homogénéisante de l’école de langue française en contexte minoritaire et invitons les acteurs de la scène éducative à tenir compte du plurilinguisme des élèves dans leurs pratiques.

ABSTRACT

This article presents the results of a multiple case study conducted with eight pupils who were schooled in French at the end of the elementary years in Southwestern Ontario. It describes, on the one hand, their social representations of languages and, on the other, the potential connections between these representations and how they made verbs agree in number with their subject when they write. Results show that participants constructed positive representations towards languages and plurilingualism; for this reason, it is difficult to formulate reliable hypotheses vis-à-vis their influence on subject-verb agreement. In our discussion, we examine the homogenizing mission of French schools in minority settings and support that teachers should take their students’ plurilingualism into account in their practice.

Mots-clés : Représentations sociales des langues, milieu francophone minoritaire, grammaire, accord du verbe, écriture.

Introduction

Fruit de luttes historiques, l’école de langue française en Ontario, fondée sur l’appartenance à une identité culturelle commune (Bélanger, 2007, 2015), joue sans conteste un rôle fondamental dans le maintien de la langue minoritaire. Cette école, dès lors pensée en fonction d’une mission homogénéisante, celle de procurer aux élèves, dans un milieu anglodominant, un espace de formation et de socialisation francophone, met en avant-plan la valorisation de la langue et de la culture françaises, et encourage fréquemment le recours exclusif à cette langue dans l’enceinte scolaire. Si elle s’avère noble, cette visée protectrice occasionne également un certain nombre d’enjeux socioéducatifs ; nous en relaterons ici deux.

Le premier a trait à l’identité linguistique hybride que se construisent les élèves qui fréquentent ces établissements (Dallaire, 2008; Dalley, 2006). Car, si l’école veut d’abord et avant tout offrir un environnement permettant la construction d’une identité linguistique francophone, l’élève ayant évolué en contexte minoritaire, lui, se situe immanquablement à la confluence d’au moins deux langues-cultures. Les acteurs de la scène éducative, devant cette pluralité linguistique indéniable, ont donc comme mandat d’amener les élèves à développer un capital linguistique et culturel français, et ce, en mettant en place une éducation inclusive, dans laquelle les élèves, plurilingues, peuvent se reconnaitre et s’épanouir. Cette situation, que Heller (2006) qualifie de paradoxale, encouragerait le personnel scolaire à participer à l’unification du marché linguistique (Bélanger, 2007) en ne valorisant que le français dit standard et à former les élèves au monolinguisme français (Labrie, 2007). On peut donc se demander si et comment les apprenants font sens de cette éducation, qui tend à faire fi de leur vécu plurilingue.

L’autre enjeu, qui fait écho au premier, concerne l’arrivée massive des élèves issus de l’immigration dans les écoles de langue française en milieu minoritaire, ceux-ci contribuant indubitablement à la constante hétérogénéisation des populations scolaires. Comme le souligne Schroeter (2017), « [i]deas about multiculturalism and the increasing diversity of students in Francophone [minority] schools sit uncomfortably with their purpose of maintaining a cultural identity as Francophones » (p. 41). Pour valoriser le bagage de ces élèves, les écoles miseraient donc surtout sur des pratiques folklorisantes et privilégieraient principalement des célébrations ponctuelles de la diversité culturelle (Fleuret, Bangou et Ibrahim, 2013; Gérin-Lajoie, 2014). De manière générale, on note donc que l’école peine à trouver un équilibre entre la création d’une identité francophone, que l’on envisage surtout de manière monolithique (Labrie, 2010), et la pluralité qui caractérise les élèves qui la fréquentent.

C’est à la lumière de ces éléments sociolinguistiques que nous menons nos travaux, qui portent sur la description du développement de la compétence qui permet à des élèves de la fin de l’élémentaire scolarisés dans le sud-ouest de l’Ontario, la zone la plus anglodominante de la province (Ontario 400, 2016), d’accorder les verbes en nombre à l’écrit au présent de l’indicatif. Pour mieux comprendre ledit développement, dans une perspective socioconstructiviste de l’apprentissage (Vygotski, 1934/1997), nous avons également voulu le mettre en relation avec des facteurs d’ordres cognitifs, affectifs et socioéducatifs qui sont susceptibles de le soutenir ou de le freiner. Dans cet article, nous mettrons l’accent sur un facteur affectif dont la popularité est grandissante en didactique : les représentations sociales sur les langues. De cette façon, nous pourrons notamment voir, d’une part, si le contexte sociolinguistique composite dans lequel les élèves évoluent et les tensions qui gravitent autour de leur plurilinguisme en contexte minoritaire façonnent la construction de leurs représentations et, d’autre part, si ces représentations influent sur leurs accords verbaux.

Les représentations sociales des langues

D’après Carlo, Jin-Ok, Granget, Prodeau et Véronique (2009), apprendre une langue ne se résume pas à enclencher une mécanique qui tournerait sans ratés, à condition de lui fournir du matériau linguistique. Comme ils le postulent, l’être humain s’appropriant une langue fonde aussi son apprentissage sur les représentations qu’il se construit de la langue elle-même et du groupe social qui en fait usage. En milieu minoritaire, on peut effectivement se demander si l’élève dont l’identité linguistique plurielle peine à être reconnue par le système éducatif est enclin à développer un répertoire de représentations négatives vis-à-vis du français et si ces représentations peuvent influer sur son engagement dans l’apprentissage de la langue de scolarisation. Dans cette optique, depuis quelques années, on s’intéresse, surtout en didactique des langues secondes, aux représentations sociales que l’élève développe à l’égard des langues et à leurs influences potentielles sur le développement de compétences linguistiques (Lory, 2015; Moore, 2006).

Les écrits de Moscovici et de Jodelet en psychologie sociale sont ceux qui servent de piliers théoriques ; sur eux repose la recherche portant sur les représentations sociales. Pour Moscovici (1961), les représentations sociales revêtent trois dimensions : (1) un certain niveau d’information détenue par l’individu à l’intérieur de son (ses) groupe(s) d’appartenance à propos d’un objet donné, (2) une dimension structurale, c’est-à-dire la façon dont sont hiérarchisées les représentations, et (3) une dimension attitudinale, une position évaluative vis-à-vis de l’objet de représentation. De manière générale, pour Jodelet (1984), les représentations renvoient donc à des façons de penser la réalité, dont les assises significatives sont socialement construites. Ainsi permettent-elles à un sujet de se positionner, souvent sans même qu’il en prenne conscience, à l’égard d’un objet, ce dernier pouvant adopter plusieurs formes (une idée, un construit, une personne, un évènement, une langue, etc.).

Depuis les années 1980, avec l’avènement de l’approche communicative, on reconnait de plus en plus que l’apprentissage d’une langue, première ou seconde, s’opère d’abord et avant tout dans l’interaction. Ces interactions, par l’intermédiaire desquelles sont partagées et coconstruites les représentations, constituent un outil facilitant le développement linguistique. Cela dit, l’interaction constitue aussi un véhicule permettant aux représentations de l’individu, dynamiques, d’évoluer à partir de celles qui existent dans ses groupes d’appartenance (Moore, 2006). C’est devant cet état de fait que de nombreux chercheurs européens en didactique ont commencé à s’interroger sur le rôle des représentations sur les langues dans leur apprentissage. Pour Dabène, citée dans Castellotti et Moore (2002), « on reconnait en particulier que les représentations que les locuteurs se font des langues, de leurs normes, de leurs caractéristiques, ou de leurs statuts au regard d’autres langues influencent les procédures et les stratégies qu’ils développent et mettent en œuvre pour les apprendre et les utiliser » (p. 7). Müller (1995), de son côté, mentionne que les représentations constituent une variable qui, en arrière-plan, agit comme des filtres influençant l’acquisition de la langue seconde. Lory (2015), dans une recherche portant sur l’évolution des représentations sociales sur les langues d’élèves plurilingues de l’élémentaire québécois dans le cadre d’un projet scolaire visant la valorisation et la mise à profit de leur plurilinguisme en classe, identifie six raisons qui motiveraient l’étude de ce concept en didactique (tableau 1).

  1. Les représentations négatives sur les langues sont susceptibles de constituer une barrière à la mise en place de pratiques pédagogiques collaboratives et inclusives au cœur desquelles les langues des élèves, les langues de scolarisation et la diversité linguistique cohabitent et sont considérées comme des atouts dans l’apprentissage.
  1. Les représentations sur les langues jouent sur les dimensions cognitives et langagières impliquées dans le processus d’apprentissage.
  1. Par leur aspect holistique, les représentations nous permettent spécifiquement de considérer les processus mobilisés dans l’émergence de ces représentations et ceux qui sont en jeu dans le processus d’apprentissage
  1. Les représentations sont susceptibles d’influencer le maintien ou non des langues d’origine des élèves.
  1. Les représentations peuvent influencer le désir d’apprentissage ultérieur de langue(s) d’origine et de nouvelles langues.
  1. Le développement de représentations positives sur la diversité linguistique a une influence au niveau social dans la mesure où ces représentations participent à l’atténuation des stéréotypes et des préjugés vis-à-vis de l’Autre et sont à la base de la construction d’un « vivre-ensemble » dans les sociétés plurilingues et pluriculturelles actuelles.

Tableau 1 : Arguments justifiant la pertinence de l’étude des représentations sociales en didactique des langues (Lory, 2015, p. 82-83)

 

Étant donné le sujet de notre recherche, le développement de la compétence liée à l’accord du verbe en nombre et ses liens potentiels avec les représentations sociales de l’élève sur les langues, nous présentons maintenant des résultats de recherches qui témoignent du deuxième point listé par Lory (2015), l’influence des représentations sur les processus cognitifs et langagiers qui sont impliqués dans l’apprentissage. Les recherches en didactique s’étant intéressées aux représentations sociales des langues ont surtout focalisé sur leur évolution lors de programmes d’éveil aux langues, qui visent la reconnaissance du plurilinguisme de l’élève et son utilisation en salle de classe. Ces travaux montrent, entre autres, que l’élève ayant développé des représentations positives eu égard à ses langues et au plurilinguisme sait plus facilement se distancier vis-à-vis de son répertoire linguistique et qu’il est à même de développer des outils cognitifs et métalinguistiques pour résoudre différents problèmes (Castellotti et Moore, 2002). Ces élèves construiraient également une compétence lexicale plus fine, surtout pour ce qui est du vocabulaire associé aux langues et à leur utilisation, et ils afficheraient, grâce à de tels programmes, un développement important dans leur style argumentatif (Lory, 2015).

En écriture, l’étude de Fleuret et Armand (2012), menée auprès de 11 élèves créolophones haïtiens suivis de la maternelle à la troisième année, a cherché à comprendre l’influence potentielle des représentations sociales à l’égard des deux langues (français-créole) et du bi/plurilinguisme sur le développement orthographique. Sans pouvoir attester de la normativité des données, les chercheures remarquent toutefois des tendances qui nous incitent à approfondir le lien représentations-développement orthographique. En effet, les élèves du groupe qui accuse un développement orthographique lent sont également ceux qui ne manifestent qu’une faible curiosité relative à l’apprentissage des langues et qui posent un regard négatif sur la diversité linguistique. Ceux du groupe rapide, à l’inverse, sont davantage ouverts par rapport à l’apprentissage du français et à la diversité. Le discours tenu par les élèves dont le développement est plus rapide est également mieux appuyé sur le plan métalinguistique, car ils savent argumenter en faveur du bi/plurilinguisme, notamment à l’aide de réflexions métalinguistiques.

L’accord du verbe en nombre à l’écrit

Pour contextualiser notre recherche, nous devons également nous arrêter sur la compétence linguistique dont nous avons initialement décrit le développement (Thibeaut, Fleuret et Lefrançois, à paraitre) et que nous avons mise en lien avec les représentations sociales des langues de nos participants : celle qui sous-tend l’accord du verbe en nombre à l’écrit. Si la règle qui en régit le fonctionnement — le verbe s’accorde en nombre et en personne avec le noyau du groupe en fonction sujet (Boivin et Pinsonneault, 2008) — parait relativement simple, cet accord est en fait doté d’une complexité importante pour le jeune scripteur, et ce, pour plusieurs raisons. D’abord, au présent de l’indicatif, les verbes les plus fréquents, qui sont aussi les plus irréguliers, affichent de nombreux radicaux (Meleuc et Fauchart, 1999; Roy-Mercier et Chartrand, 2016). De surcroit, la grande majorité des marques morphologiques que le scripteur doit orthographier en accordant le verbe est inaudible (Fayol et Jaffré, 2014). Enfin, la complexité de la structure phrastique peut jouer un rôle de premier ordre dans la réussite de l’accord ; de ce fait, si le sujet se réalise sous la forme d’un simple pronom, l’accord est susceptible d’être réussi. Cela dit, s’il existe une distance syntaxique entre le donneur et le receveur d’accord, les probabilités d’erreurs augmentent (Boyer, 2012; Cogis, 2013). Ainsi la recherche en milieu majoritaire nous dit-elle que, à la fin du cours élémentaire, l’apprentissage de l’accord est entamé, mais pas complété. Il existerait en outre une hétérogénéité importante dans les connaissances des élèves vis-à-vis de cet objet d’apprentissage (Geoffre et Brissaud, 2012). Il nous semblait donc intéressant de voir, dans le cadre de notre recherche, si un ensemble de facteurs de différents ordres pouvaient influer sur son développement à la fin de l’élémentaire puisque les élèves sont censés en avoir construit certaines connaissances, mais que ces dernières varient d’un scripteur à l’autre.

Ainsi, à la lumière de ces éléments de conceptualisation, nous pouvons maintenant poser les questions auxquelles nous répondrons dans cet article. Elles sont au nombre de deux :

  1. Quelles sont les représentations sociales sur les langues que se sont construites des élèves de la fin du cours élémentaire scolarisés en français dans le sud-ouest de l’Ontario ?
  2. Quels sont les liens qui unissent ces représentations et le développement de leur compétence à accorder les verbes en nombre à l’écrit au présent de l’indicatif ?

Méthodologie

De nature exploratoire, la recherche de laquelle sont tirées les données présentées dans cet article est une étude de cas multiples (Karsenti et Demers, 2011; Stake, 1995) réalisée auprès de huit élèves scolarisés au sein d’une classe multiâges de la 5e/6e années, dans le Sud-Ouest ontarien. Au début de l’étude, en janvier 2015, la moitié des participants était en 5e année, tandis que l’autre était en 6e année. Ils connaissent tous minimalement deux langues, ce qui est typique des élèves en contexte minoritaire, mais certains d’entre eux en connaissent d’autres, leurs parents étant issus de l’immigration. Afin de rendre compte des répertoires langagiers de nos élèves, nous présentons le tableau 2, dans lequel nous faisons état des langues que nos participants parlent à la maison.

Élève (niveau scolaire en début d’étude) Langue(s) parlée(s) avec la mère Langue(s) parlée(s) avec le père
Emma (5e) Anglais Anglais
Maya (5e) Anglais, français Anglais
Ali (5e) Arabe, français, anglais Anglais, arabe, français
Alicia (5e) Anglais, tagalog, français Anglais
Sabrina (6e) Anglais, français, espagnol Anglais
Pierre (6e) Créole haïtien Créole haïtien
Kate (6e) Anglais, français Anglais
Isaac (6e) Swahili, français Français, anglais

Tableau 2 : Langue(s) que les participants utilisent lorsqu’ils parlent à leurs parents

 

Pour décrire leurs représentations sociales sur les langues, deux outils de collecte ont été retenus : le questionnaire à questions fermées et l’entretien individuel semi-dirigé. Le questionnaire a été conçu dans le cadre du projet Élodil (Éveil au langage et ouverture à la diversité linguistique) (Armand et Maraillet, 2004). Sa forme est inspirée des travaux de Harter (1999), et l’élève est donc appelé à nuancer le positionnement binaire qu’il a initialement adopté en fonction de l’item qui lui est présenté. Cette épreuve, constituée de 16 questions et administrée en janvier 2016, aborde deux thèmes qui concernent les langues, chacun d’eux se manifestant par huit items. Le premier concerne l’ouverture à la diversité linguistique (représentations sur les langues et sur les locuteurs de ces langues), le deuxième vise à connaitre la motivation et la curiosité face à l’apprentissage des langues. Lors de l’analyse des données, nous avons appliqué une échelle de valeur positive et négative allant de deux points à moins deux points. Pour chacun des deux axes du questionnaire, un total de 16 points était donc possible. Voici un exemple d’item portant sur l’ouverture de l’élève quant à la diversité linguistique.

Figure 1 : Exemple d'item du questionnaire Source : Harter, 1999.
Figure 1 : Exemple d’item du questionnaire
Source : Harter, 1999.

 

Afin de trianguler les données provenant du questionnaire, et parce les représentations sociales peuvent surtout être recueillies à partir des discours, eux aussi socialement ancrés (Moore et Py, 2008), nous avons rencontré chacun de nos huit participants dans le cadre d’un entretien individuel semi-dirigé, lequel s’est aussi tenu en janvier 2016. Pour ce faire, nous avons repris le guide d’entrevue d’Armand et Maraillet (2004), qui contient cinq grands thèmes : le thème 1 a trait à l’utilité des langues, le thème 2 cible l’appréciation des langues, le thème 3 concerne l’égalité des langues, le thème 4 porte sur l’égalité des locuteurs des langues et le thème 5 aborde les langues dans le monde. Les questions ont été posées en français, bien que les élèves n’aient reçu aucune directive quant à la langue à adopter en y répondant. À la suite des entrevues, que nous avons audiocaptées, nous avons procédé à leur transcription en verbatim et, dans la section suivante, nous en présenterons des extraits qui relèvent de deux de ces six thèmes, ceux que nous jugeons les plus pertinents pour notre sujet d’étude : l’égalité des langues (« Quelqu’un m’a dit que toutes les langues sont égales. Qu’est-ce que ça veut dire « égal » ? Qu’est-ce que tu en penses ? ») et l’égalité des locuteurs des langues (« À ton avis, est-ce que les personnes qui parlent français ont plus de chance que celles qui parlent d’autres langues ? Pourquoi ? »).

Comme nous le disions précédemment, l’étude ici présentée s’inscrit dans une recherche plus large visant la description du développement de la compétence qui sous-tend l’accord du verbe en nombre à l’écrit. L’étude initiale (Thibeault, Fleuret et Lefrançois, à paraitre) a donc permis l’émergence de trois groupes de scripteurs, leur nom ayant été remplacé par un pseudonyme dans cet article. Le premier groupe, composé de Pierre, de Sabrina et d’Emma, fait preuve d’une compétence affinée dès le début de l’étude ; ces élèves s’engagent presque systématiquement dans la quête d’un donneur d’accord, ils détiennent des connaissances morphologiques fécondes à l’endroit du verbe, mais les environnements syntaxiques complexes, par exemple lorsque le verbe se situe en amont de son sujet, peuvent leur occasionner des difficultés. Le profil de ces élèves n’évolue que peu au gré de l’étude. Plus faible, le deuxième groupe, Isaac, Kate et Maya, est tout à fait différent. Au début de la recherche, ces élèves ne connaissent pas la marque prototypique de la pluralité des verbes (-ent) et ne s’engagent jamais dans la recherche d’un donneur lors du processus d’accord ; ils commettent de facto un nombre d’erreurs plus élevé. À la fin de l’étude, on note une intériorisation progressive du pluriel des verbes, mais leur réflexion grammaticale ne leur permet pas encore d’identifier le donneur d’accord. En ce sens, ils orthographient parfois les verbes avec le –ent attendu, sans nécessairement pouvoir en justifier la présence. Le troisième groupe, Alicia et Ali, ressemble au deuxième groupe au début de la recherche. Toutefois, au gré des 13 mois de l’étude, il fait montre d’un développement notable et, au terme de la recherche, il rappelle davantage les élèves du groupe 1. Dans cet article, à l’aune des trois groupes qui ont fait surface dans l’étude initiale, nous présenterons les représentations sociales des langues de nos participants et nous les mettrons en lien avec le développement de la compétence permettant l’accord verbal en nombre à l’écrit.

Résultats

Pour présenter nos résultats, nous explorerons d’abord les scores des élèves au questionnaire en fonction des deux axes qui en ont orienté la conception. Lorsque ces données seront mises au jour, nous nous concentrerons sur chacun des huit élèves selon leur groupe d’appartenance et nous présenterons des extraits issus de l’entretien individuel que nous avons mené avec eux.

Faisant état des scores au questionnaire, le diagramme à bandes verticales représenté dans la figure 2 nous révèle que les représentations sociales des langues de nos participants paraissent généralement positives ; ils semblent donc tous relativement ouverts à la diversité linguistique et curieux face à l’apprentissage des langues. Cela étant dit, un lien entre les représentations sociales des langues et le développement de la compétence associée à l’accord verbal à l’écrit ne semble pas se manifester à partir des données du questionnaire. Du côté de l’ouverture à la diversité linguistique, ce sont deux élèves du groupe 2, Kate (14/16) et Isaac (11/16), qui obtiennent les scores les plus élevés. Suit la dernière participante de ce groupe, Maya, qui affiche le même score que deux des trois élèves du groupe 1, Pierre et Sabrina (8/16). Emma leur succède avec un score de 7/16, tandis que les deux élèves du groupe 3 enregistrent les scores les plus bas : Alicia obtient 4/16, Ali est l’unique élève dont le score relatif à l’ouverture à la diversité est négatif (-2/16). En ce qui concerne la motivation et la curiosité vis-à-vis de l’apprentissage des langues, Isaac (15/16) demeure en tête de lice, devant Emma et Sabrina, qui obtiennent un résultat identique (11/16). Maya les suit de près (10/16), alors qu’Alicia, Ali et Kate présentent un score de 7/16. Avec un score de 3/16, Pierre est celui qui obtient le plus bas.

Figure 2 : Représentations sociales des langues
Figure 2 : Représentations sociales des langues

 

Dans le groupe 1, celui qui présente une compétence certaine à accorder les verbes du début à la fin de la recherche, les élèves semblent s’être construit des représentations positives à l’égard des langues, leur score concernant l’ouverture à la diversité au questionnaire se situant entre 7/16 et 8/16, et celui sur la curiosité vis-à-vis de l’apprentissage des langues étant de 3/16, pour Pierre, et de 11/16, pour Sabrina et Emma. Cette dernière, quand on lui demande si, pour elle, toutes les langues sont égales, s’empresse de répondre à l’affirmative. Elle précise :

Expérimentateur : Pourquoi est-ce que tu penses que les langues sont égales ?

Emma : Parce que tu peux encore dire la même chose comme, euh. . .mais dans des différentes façons et comme. . .il y a des. . .il y a des lieux où tu peux utiliser cette langue.

Emma, qui met en avant le côté arbitraire des langues, affirme donc qu’elles sont égales de deux points de vue. D’une part, elle souligne qu’elles servent toutes à nommer des réalités, mais de façons différentes ; de l’autre, elle reconnait que ces réalités sont tributaires du contexte géographique, que l’on recourt à certaines langues dans certains milieux. La réponse qu’elle offre quand nous lui demandons si les locuteurs du français ont plus de chance que les autres abonde dans le même sens. En effet, elle mentionne que, pour elle, ce n’est pas le cas, mais qu’une personne qui connait les deux langues officielles du Canada est plus chanceuse :

Expérimentateur : Pourquoi tu penses qu’on a plus de chance si on parle les deux ?

Emma : Parce qu’il y a des jobs en Canada. Comme tu parles français, so t’as plus de chance d’avoir un job.

Dans ce passage, elle fait mention d’une caractéristique pragmatique liée à l’apprentissage du français au Canada, cette langue permettant selon elle d’accéder à un nombre d’emplois plus élevé.

Sabrina, pour sa part, discute davantage de l’utilité communicationnelle des langues. Elle met en évidence la valeur équivalente des langues et la justifie en précisant qu’elles sont toutes un outil de communication. Quand nous lui posons la question sur les locuteurs des langues anglaise et française, elle offre une réponse qui reflète cette perspective.

Expérimentateur : À ton avis, est-ce que les personnes qui parlent français ont plus de chance que les personnes qui parlent anglais ?

Sabrina : Non.

Expérimentateur : Et est-ce que les personnes qui parlent anglais ont plus de chance que les personnes qui parlent français ?

Sabrina : Non.

Expérimentateur : Non. Pourquoi ?

Sabrina : Car les deux servent pour la même utilité que pour parler avec tes amis, enseignante et apprendre les langues aussi.

Ainsi est-elle d’avis que les personnes qui parlent le français et l’anglais ont une chance égale, car les langues serviraient principalement à communiquer. Nonobstant le milieu anglodominant par le truchement duquel elle est socialisée au langage, il appert que Sabrina n’accorde pas de statut particulier à l’anglais. Elle semble aussi reconnaitre une certaine valeur euristique aux langues, puisqu’elle souligne, à la toute fin de ce passage, qu’une langue peut être mise à profit dans l’apprentissage d’autres langues.

Les représentations de Pierre quant à l’égalité des langues et de leurs locuteurs ne semblent toutefois pas être aussi positives que celles de ses camarades du groupe 1. Quand nous lui demandons si les langues sont toutes égales, il nous déclare, après un long moment d’hésitation, « un peu ». Au moment où nous l’invitons à expliciter sa pensée, il peine à répondre et, après quelques secondes, il affirme ceci :

Pierre : Le créole est presque le même avec le français.

Expérimentateur : Okay, pourquoi ?

Pierre : Parce que quand tu dis bonjour en créole, c’est le même qu’en français, mais tu ne mets pas le r.

Créolophone haïtien, Pierre, qui montre ici sa connaissance d’un lexique similaire en créole et en français, reconnait qu’une langue peut être égale à une autre en raison de leur proximité linguistique. Plus tard dans l’entrevue, nous l’invitons à s’exprimer concernant les locuteurs du français en nous disant si, d’après lui, ils ont la même chance que les locuteurs de l’anglais.

Expérimentateur : À ton avis, est-ce que les personnes qui parlent français ont la même chance que les personnes qui parlent anglais ?

Pierre : Pas vraiment.

Expérimentateur : Pourquoi ?

Pierre : Parce qu’on est un pays qui est anglais. Si tu ne parles pas anglais, tu ne peux pas comprendre ce que les personnes dit.

De manière similaire à Sabrina, Pierre semble admettre la visée communicationnelle des langues, mais restreint sa réflexion au contexte canadien anglophone. Il parait donc être bien conscient du fait qu’il grandit dans un milieu où le français est minoritaire et, conséquemment, il croit que l’anglais s’avère essentiel. Rappelons finalement que Pierre obtient au questionnaire un score analogue à celui de Sabrina et d’Emma pour la dimension touchant l’ouverture à la diversité linguistique, mais que celui en lien avec la curiosité à l’endroit de l’apprentissage des langues est inférieur de 8 points au résultat de ses pairs. Il appert donc que ce score trouve un certain écho dans les propos qu’il tient pendant l’entrevue, car il ne semble pas positionner les locuteurs du français et de l’anglais sur un pied d’égalité, en raison de l’anglodominance caractérisant son milieu.

Les membres du groupe 2, moins compétents lorsqu’ils accordent leurs verbes au gré de la recherche, obtiennent des scores équivalents (Maya) ou plus élevés (Kate et Isaac) que ceux du premier groupe pour ce qui est de l’ouverture à la diversité linguistique. Les résultats associés à la curiosité et à la motivation relatives à l’apprentissage des langues sont quant à eux plus épars ; ils varient entre 7/16, pour Kate, et 15/16, pour Isaac. Ce dernier participant, quand nous lui demandons si, selon lui, les langues sont égales, nous répond ceci :

Expérimentateur : Quelqu’un m’a dit que toutes les langues sont égales. Qu’est-ce que ça veut dire, égales?

Isaac : Umm, ils sont tous importantes.

Expérimentateur : Elles sont tous importantes. Elles sont toutes importantes de la même façon. Et qu’est-ce que tu penses de ça?

Isaac : Je pense que c’est bon.

Expérimentateur : Pourquoi, tu penses?

Isaac : Mais il y a certaines langues que tu parles plus, le latin.

Expérimentateur : Le latin, oui.

Isaac : Parce que si tu es la personne qui sait ça, tu peux enseigner aux autres.

À partir de cet échange, nous posons l’hypothèse que, pour Isaac, la visée première d’une langue est la communication. En effet, il souligne que toutes les langues sont importantes, mais il fait aussi mention d’une langue morte, le latin, qu’il semble opposer à celles qui sont encore en usage. Sans contextualiser ses dires, il précise ensuite que les langues peuvent être utilisées à des fins didactiques, qu’elles peuvent être enseignées à ceux qui ne les connaissent pas. Enfin, Isaac ajoute que les locuteurs du français n’ont pas plus de chance que les locuteurs de l’anglais, mais il déclare ne pas être en mesure d’expliciter sa pensée, ni en français ni en anglais.

Du côté de Kate, c’est le caractère spécial que revêtent les langues qui les rend égales.

Expérimentateur : Quelqu’un m’a dit une fois que toutes les langues étaient égales. Qu’est-ce que ça veut dire, pour toi, égales?

Kate : Que toutes les langues sont comme également spéciales et. . .

Expérimentateur : Okay, tu penses quoi de ça, toi ?

Kate : Je pense que c’est vrai parce que tous les langues sont égales parce que on a besoin de tous les langues, elles sont tous égales parce que tout. . .comme tout le monde parle cette langue, et c’est vraiment important pour tout le monde. Alors, c’est égal.

Kate semble d’abord reconnaitre que les langues sont utiles pour la communication, mais elle met l’accent sur l’importance des langues pour leurs locuteurs. Lorsque nous la questionnons concernant la chance qu’ont les locuteurs du français et de l’anglais, elle nous répond qu’ils ont une chance égale, et ce, pour deux raisons. D’abord, elle fait mention des perspectives d’emplois qui sont associées aux connaissances de ces langues. Elle souligne aussi qu’il existe plusieurs endroits où les gens parlent français ou anglais et, de ce fait, la connaissance de ces deux langues peut donc s’avérer utile en déplacement. Somme toute, Kate semble reconnaitre que les langues jouent un rôle pluriel ; elles servent à la communication, à l’emploi et aux voyages, mais elle admet aussi que les langues sont importantes pour ceux qui les parlent. Elle les discute donc autant dans une optique pragmatique, en traitant de ce que les langues permettent de réaliser, mais aussi dans une perspective axée sur l’affectivité.

Maya, réservée pendant l’entretien, ne propose guère de réponses élaborées à nos questions.

Expérimentateur : Quelqu’un m’a dit une fois que toutes les langues étaient égales. Qu’est-ce que ça veut dire, pour toi, égales?

Maya : Toutes les langues sert à quelque chose et elles ont tous une importance.

Expérimentateur : Okay, puis t’en penses quoi ?

Maya : Je pense que comme toutes les langues sont uniques et belles.

À la suite de la première question, Maya se focalise sur les visées pragmatiques des langues, en ce sens qu’elle mentionne qu’elles sont importantes, qu’elles servent toutes à quelque chose. Puis, quand nous sondons plus précisément son opinion, elle semble adopter une perspective esthétique, en mettant en évidence la beauté et l’unicité des langues. Elle évite toutefois la question que nous lui posons plus tard dans l’entrevue, celle portant sur les locuteurs des langues.

Eu égard au groupe 3, dont les membres accusent un progrès notable eu égard à l’accord verbal entre le début et la fin de l’étude, les résultats pour l’ouverture à la diversité linguistique varient de -2/16, pour Ali, à 4/16, pour Alicia ; ils sont toutefois identiques concernant la curiosité et la motivation dans l’apprentissage des langues (7/16). Ali déclare que, à son avis, les langues sont égales parce qu’elles sont toutes utiles. Puis, sans que nous le sollicitions, il nous raconte la visite d’un invité à son école.

Expérimentateur : Et d’après toi, toutes les langues sont égales?

Ali : Comme dans. . .il y a. . .il y a Mister Serge, il est venu dans la classe.

Expérimentateur : Mister qui ?

Ali : Monsieur Serge. Il est quelqu’un d’Ottawa. Lui, il nous a parlé, et dans son country et dans son city, ils parlent plus que 160 langues.

Expérimentateur : C’est Ottawa, son city ?

Ali : Non, à Afrique. C’est actually vraiment intéressant.

Ce passage semble montrer qu’Ali a non seulement des représentations positives à l’égard des langues, mais aussi à l’endroit de leurs locuteurs et, de manière générale, du plurilinguisme. Dans cette même optique, quand nous lui demandons si les locuteurs du français ont plus de chance que ceux de l’anglais, il répond à l’affirmative, parce que les locuteurs de l’anglais sont plus nombreux et que, par conséquent, d’après lui, leur langue est plus facile à apprendre. Cette réponse nous amène à évoquer le contexte francophone minoritaire dans lequel il est socialisé et où l’anglais est prégnant. En effet, s’il croit que les locuteurs du français ont plus de chance, c’est probablement parce que, autour de lui, ceux qui parlent français parlent également anglais, alors que les locuteurs de l’anglais n’ont pas nécessairement de connaissances du français. Il fait donc preuve d’une ouverture intéressante à la diversité linguistique, une telle ouverture n’apparaissant pas clairement dans ses résultats au questionnaire. Il est également intéressant de noter qu’il se permet d’alterner entre l’anglais et le français dans son discours.

De son côté, Alicia souligne que, pour elle, l’égalité des langues renvoie à l’unicité de chacune d’elle, mais elle met également en avant quelques traits linguistiques qui caractérisent les langues.

Expérimentateur : Puis, est-ce qu’il y a d’autres choses qui te viennent en tête quand tu dis que les langues sont égales ?

Alicia : Elles sont un peu différentes. Comme prononcées différemment aussi.

Expérimentateur : Et t’en penses quoi de ça, que les prononciations soient différentes ?

Alicia : Je sais pas.

Si les langues sont uniques aux yeux d’Alicia, il semble donc que ce soit en raison des traits linguistiques qui diffèrent d’un idiome à l’autre. Il est intéressant que, bien qu’elle fasse mention de différences interlinguistiques, elle ne s’arrête guère aux similitudes, le français et l’anglais en partageant pourtant un grand nombre. Au moment où nous lui demandons si les locuteurs du français ont plus de chance que les locuteurs de l’anglais, elle nous répond que ce sont les personnes qui connaissent les deux langues qui sont les plus chanceuses.

Expérimentateur : Est-ce que les personnes qui parlent français ont plus de chance que celles qui parlent anglais ?

Alicia : If you’re bilingual, comme ça.

Expérimentateur : Donc, d’après toi ?

Alicia : Un peu, oui. Car si tu veux un job pis tu sais les deux langues, et une personne parle en français, tu peux lui parler.

On note donc qu’Alicia, qui alterne aussi les codes, considère l’utilité des langues en termes de perspectives d’emploi. Elle mentionne tout de même que la connaissance du français peut l’amener à entrer en interaction avec un locuteur de cette langue.

Discussion

Les résultats issus de notre analyse des représentations des langues de nos participants ne permettent pas de comprendre leur rôle dans le développement de la compétence liée à l’accord du verbe en nombre à l’écrit. En effet, parce que les élèves semblent pratiquement tous ouverts à la diversité linguistique et curieux face à l’apprentissage des langues, il devient compliqué de statuer sur l’influence de ces représentations sur le développement de la compétence ciblée. Certains élèves, comme Kate et Isaac, font partie du groupe de scripteurs le plus faible, mais témoignent de représentations relativement positives à l’endroit des langues. Eu égard aux scripteurs du groupe fort (p. ex., Sabrina), ils semblent également valoriser la diversité linguistique et l’apprentissage des langues ; par conséquent, le lien qui unit les représentations sociales des langues et la compétence permettant l’accord verbal, dans notre étude, demeure imprécis. Cela peut probablement être expliqué par les éléments de représentations sur lesquels nous nous sommes penchés, ces derniers demeurant généraux et ne touchant pas précisément la grammaire et l’orthographe. Cela étant, si on considère, à l’instar de plusieurs (Lory, 2015; Moore, 2006; Castellotti et Moore, 2002; Müller, 1995), que la construction de représentations positives à l’égard des langues et du plurilinguisme joue sur les dimensions cognitives et langagières impliquées dans le processus d’apprentissage, notamment orthographique (Fleuret et Armand, 2012), on ne peut que se réjouir en constatant l’ouverture et la curiosité dont font montre nos élèves vis-à-vis des cultures et des langues qui les véhiculent. Il convient au demeurant de souligner que de nombreux facteurs peuvent façonner le développement d’une compétence linguistique et que c’est en les prenant holistiquement en considération qu’on arrivera à bien le décrire.

Concernant les représentations sociales des langues, la question que l’on pourrait se poser est la suivante : comment se fait-il que nos participants fassent preuve de représentations aussi positives ? D’après nous, la réponse se trouve en grande partie dans le contexte francophone minoritaire plurilingue par l’entremise duquel ils sont socialisés aux langues et aux cultures. Car, rappelons-le, ces huit élèves sont quotidiennement exposés à un minimum de deux langues et, dans cette optique, le plurilinguisme qui caractérise leur milieu sociolinguistique n’est guère un fait isolé et marginal : il constitue l’essence même d’une majorité de leurs échanges linguistiques, l’idéal monolingue standardisé, largement utopique en milieu minoritaire, étant surtout imposé par et pour l’école (Bélanger, 2007; Labrie, 2007). Il est d’ailleurs intéressant de souligner que, malgré l’omniprésence de l’anglais dans leur milieu, la plupart des participants ne confère pas de statut privilégié à l’idiome dominant. Dans cette perspective, on peut aussi constater le plurilinguisme de nos participants dans plusieurs de nos extraits de verbatim, dans le cadre desquels certains d’entre eux se permettent aisément une alternance de codes et se promènent régulièrement entre le français et l’anglais. Cette alternance, en fait, ne renverrait guère à une paresse cognitive ou à un manque de connaissances des langues en interaction, elle constitue surtout une manifestation potentielle du langage, une ressource à mobiliser et une compétence à développer dans l’interaction, à des fins communicationnelles (Stratilaki et Bono, 2006). Il n’est d’ailleurs pas surprenant, en définitive, que nos participants, qui font preuve d’ouverture à l’endroit de la diversité linguistique et qui ne considèrent généralement pas la pluralité linguistique comme un frein à l’apprentissage des langues, adoptent des pratiques discursives plurilingues en entrevue.

Conclusion

Non seulement les élèves de notre étude sont-ils plurilingues, ils se sont également construit des représentations positives à l’égard des langues. Il semble donc important que les pratiques pédagogiques qui sont mises en place à l’école pour les soutenir dans le développement de connaissances linguistiques tiennent compte de leur identité linguistique hybride, qu’elles la valorisent, voire qu’elles la mettent à profit. Rappelons-le, c’est à partir de ses connaissances linguistiques, aussi plurielles soient-elles, que l’élève s’approprie la langue de l’école (Moore, 2006) et, donc, il importe de les positionner au coeur des pratiques pédagogiques. Un tel changement de posture nécessite toutefois une redéfinition de la mission homogénéisante de l’école francophone en milieu minoritaire (Cavanagh, Cammarata et Blain, 2016), qui se définit désormais dans l’hétérogénéité, et requiert du personnel enseignant qu’il considère la langue et la culture francophones de façon prospective. Dit autrement, il conviendrait que l’élève ne soit plus perçu comme un agent de reproduction d’une langue et d’une culture déjà existantes, mais bien comme le producteur d’une culture francophone nouvelle, plurielle, dans laquelle tous sont équitablement reconnus (Gérin-Lajoie, 2010).

Références bibliographiques

Armand, F. et Maraillet, É. (2004). Questionnaire ÉLODIL. Projet de recherche collaborative. Université de Montréal.

Bélanger, N. (2015). L’éducation en langue française en Ontario d’hier à aujourd’hui. Problématiser la notion de choix au regard de la forme scolaire. Revue d’histoire de l’éducation, 27(2), 48-63.

Bélanger, N. (2007). Une école, des langues… ? L’enseignement du français en milieu minoritaire en Ontario. Le français aujourd’hui, 158(3), 49-57.

Boivin, M.-C. et Pinsonneault, R. (2008). Grammaire moderne : description et éléments pour sa didactique. Montréal, Canada : Beauchemin et Chenelière Éducation.

Boyer, P. (2012). La compétence morphographique d’élèves de première secondaire. L’effet du biais d’évaluation de son efficacité personnelle sur la performance (thèse de doctorat, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada). Récupéré le 5 février 2017 d’Archipel, le dépôt numérique de l’Université du Québec à Montréal : http://www.archipel.uqam.ca/5352/1/D2405.pdf

Carlo, C., Jin-Ok, K., Granget, C., Prodeau, M. et Véronique, D. (2009). La recherche sur l’acquisition des langues étrangères : quelques repères. Dans D. Véronique (dir.), L’acquisition de la grammaire du français langue étrangère (p. 17-52). Paris, France : Didier.

Castellotti, V. et Moore, D. (2002). Représentations sociales des langues et enseignement. Guide pour l’élaboration des politiques linguistiques éducatives en Europe – De la diversité linguistique à l’éducation plurilingue. Strasbourg, France : Conseil de l’Europe.

Cavanagh, M., Cammarata, L. et Blain, S. (2016). Enseigner en milieu francophone minoritaire canadien : synthèse des connaissances sur les défis et leurs implications pour la formation des enseignants. Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 39(4). Récupéré le 7 février 2017 du site de la revue : http://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/2268/1884

Cogis, D. (2013). Du prescrit au réel en CM2 : l’accord sujet-verbe dans le corpus Grenouille. Dans C. Gunnarsson-Largy et E. Auriac-Slusarczyk (dir.), Écriture et réécritures chez les élèves. Un seul corpus, divers genres discursifs et méthodologies d’analyse (p. 61-84). Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique : Academia-L’Harmattan.

Dallaire, C. (2008). La stabilité des discours identitaires et la représentation de la culture dans la reproduction de l’appartenance francophone chez les jeunes. Francophonies d’Amérique, 26, 357–381.

Dalley, P. (2006). Héritiers des mariages mixtes. Possibilités identitaires. Éducation et francophonie, 34(1), 82-94.

Fayol, M. et Jaffré, J.-P. (2014). L’orthographe. Paris, France : PUF.

Fleuret, C. et Armand, F. (2012). Le créole c’est presque la même affaire du français, on fait des

formules…c’est déformé : Les représentations des langues par des élèves haïtiens. Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 15(1), 42-59.

Fleuret, C., Bangou, F. et Ibrahim, A. (2013). Langues et enjeux interculturels : une exploration au cœur d’un programme d’appui à l’apprentissage du français de scolarisation pour les nouveaux arrivants. Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 36(4), 280-298.

Geoffre, T. et Brissaud, C. (2012). L’accord sujet-verbe : acquis en fin d’école primaire, vraiment? Récupéré le 7 octobre 2013 du site de SHS : http://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2012/01/shsconf_cmlf12_000196.pdf

Gérin-Lajoie, D. (2014). Le discours du personnel enseignant sur son travail quotidien. Dans A. Pilote (dir.), Francophones et citoyens du monde : identité, éducation et engagement (p. 105-122). Québec, Canada : Presses de l’Université Laval.

Gérin-Lajoie, D. (2010). Le discours du personnel enseignant sur leur travail en milieu francophone minoritaire. Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 33(2), 356-378.

Harter, S. (1999). The development of self-representations: A developmental perspective. New York, NY : Guilford Press.

Heller, M. (2006). Linguistic minorities and modernity (2e éd.). New York, NY : Bloomsbury.

Jodelet, D. (1984). Représentations sociales : phénomènes, concept et théorie. Dans S. Moscovici (dir.), Psychologie sociale (p. 359-378). Paris, France : PUF.

Karsenti, T. et Demers, S. (2011). L’étude de cas. Dans T. Karsenti et L. Savoie-Zajc (dir.), La recherche en éducation. Étapes et approches (3e éd.) (p. 229-252). Saint-Laurent, Canada : ÉRPI.

Labrie, N. (2010). La construction identitaire en milieu francophone à l’épreuve de l’analyse du discours. Dans N. Bélanger, N. Garant, P. Dalley et T. Desabrais (dir.), Produire et reproduire la francophonie en la nommant (p. 21-34). Sudbury, Canada : Prise de parole. Colombie-Britannique, Canada.

Labrie, N. (2007). La recherche sur l’éducation de langue française en milieu minoritaire : pourquoi ? Dans Y. Herry et C. Mougeot (dir.), Recherche en éducation en milieu minoritaire francophone (p. 1-14). Ottawa, Canada : Presses de l’université d’Ottawa.

Lory, M.-P. (2015). L’évolution des représentations sur les langues d’élèves plurilingues du 3e cycle du primaire lors de l’implantation d’un projet d’Éveil aux langues (thèse de doctorat, Université de Montréal, Canada). Récupéré le 5 février 2017 de Papyrus, le dépôt numérique de l’Université de Montréal : https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1866/13048/Lory_Marie-Paule_2015_these.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y

Meleuc, S. et Fauchart, N. (1999). Didactique de la conjugaison. Le verbe « autrement ». Paris, France : Bertrand-Lacoste.

Moore, D. (2006). Plurilinguismes et école. Paris, France : Didier.

Moore, D. et Py, B. (2008). Introduction. Discours sur les langues et représentations sociales. Dans G. Zarate, D. Lévy et C. Kramsch (dir.), Précis du plurilinguisme et du pluriculturalisme (p. 271-280). Paris, France : Éditions des archives contemporaines.

Moscovici, S. (1961). La Psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris, France : PUF.

Müller, R. (1995). Portée de la langue première sur l’acquisition de la langue seconde. Dans E. Poglia (dir.), Être migrant II (p. 173-196). Berne, Suisse : Peter Lang.

Ontario 400 (2016). Statistiques. Récupéré le 5 février 2017 du site d’Ontario 400 : http://ontario400.ca/statistiques/

Roy-Mercier, S. et Chartrand, S.-G. (2016). L’enseignement du système de la conjugaison pour en favoriser l’apprentissage. Dans S.-G. Chartrand (dir.), Mieux enseigner la grammaire. Pistes didactiques et activités pour la classe (p. 175-200). Montréal, Canada : ÉRPI.

Schroeter, S. (2017). Difference at play: An ethnography of discourse and drama in multiracial classrooms in a francophone minority language school (thèse de doctorat non publiée). Université de la Colombie-Britannique, Canada.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stratilaki, S. et Bono, M. (2006). Parcours d’apprentissage des apprenants des troisièmes langues : dynamiques des répertoires plurilingues en construction. Les cahiers de l’Acedle, 2, 7-35.

Thibeault, J., Fleuret, C. et Lefrançois, P. (à paraitre). Portrait du développement de la compétence linguistique qui permet l’accord du verbe en nombre à l’écrit chez des élèves de la fin de l’ordre élémentaire dans le Sud-Ouest ontarien. Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée.

Vygotski, L. (1934/1997). Pensée et langage (F. Sève, trad.). Paris, France : La dispute.

Universal Design for Belonging: Living and Working with Diverse Personal Names

Volume 1(1): 2017

KAREN PENNESI University of Western Ontario

 

ABSTRACT

There is great diversity in the names and naming practices of Canada’s population due to the multiple languages and cultures from which names and name-givers originate. While this diversity means that everyone encounters unfamiliar names, institutional agents who work with the public are continually challenged when attempting to determine a name’s correct pronunciation, spelling, structure and gender. Drawing from over a hundred interviews in London (Ontario) and Montréal (Québec), as well as other published accounts, I outline strategies used by institutional agents to manage name diversity within the constraints of their work tasks. I explain how concern with saving face and being polite can involve micro-aggressions which contribute to exclusion and disadvantage for people with certain kinds of names. Repeated mistreatment of names, whether intentional or not, negatively affects the integration of immigrants and their sense of belonging in the new society. I argue that the respectful treatment of names is a small but meaningful step toward making multilingual and multi-ethnic societies more welcoming and inclusive. Informed by the principles of Universal Design for Learning, I offer a set of recommendations for normalizing name diversity in work and social life.

Résumé

Il est possible de constater une grande diversité de noms et de pratiques de dénomination au sein de la population canadienne ceci en raison des nombreuses langues et cultures d’où proviennent ces noms et ceux qui les donnent. Alors que cette diversité a pour effet que chaque personne aura éventuellement à faire face à des noms peu familiers, on note en particulier que les agents institutionnels, qui travaillent avec le public, sont constamment mis à l’épreuve lorsqu’ils tentent de déterminer la prononciation, l’orthographe, la structure et le genre corrects d’un nom. En se fondant sur plus d’une centaine d’entrevues réalisées à London (en Ontario) et à Montréal (au Québec), ainsi que sur des comptes rendus ayant fait l’objet de publications, nous présentons des stratégies utilisées par des agents institutionnels dans leur gestion de la diversité des noms en tenant compte de leurs contraintes professionnelles. Nous expliquons que, par souci de « préserver les apparences » et de se montrer poli, ces attentions peuvent donner lieu à des micro-agressions menant à l’exclusion et à une iniquité envers les personnes portant certains types de noms. La répétition de mauvais traitements, qu’ils soient intentionnels ou non, a pour effet de porter atteinte à l’intégration des immigrants et à leur sentiment d’appartenance à la nouvelle société d’accueil. Nous soutenons que le traitement respectueux des noms représente une étape modeste mais significative pouvant mener à l’établissement de sociétés multilingues et multiethniques accueillantes et inclusives. En se fondant sur les principes de la conception universelle de l’apprentissage, nous offrons une série de recommandations pour normaliser la diversité des noms dans le travail et la vie sociale.

Keywords: Names, immigrant integration, belonging, Universal Design for Learning, Canada.

Continue reading “Universal Design for Belonging: Living and Working with Diverse Personal Names”

Unofficial Multilingualism in an Intercultural Province: Polyvocal Responses to Policy as Lived Experience

Volume 1(1): 2017

CASEY BURKHOLDER, University of New Brunswick

ALISON CRUMP, McGill University

LAUREN GODFREY-SMITH, Royal Roads University

MELA SARKAR, McGill University

 

ABSTRACT

Daily language use in Montréal (Québec) is a delicate balancing act that goes beyond bilingual / multilingual categories or multicultural / intercultural frameworks. Language policy, which to an extent dominates the Québec linguistic landscape, can also be seen as the object of constant manipulation and negotiation by individuals and communities who exercise agency in locally-determined and locally significant ways. Our Montréal-based research community, BILD (Belonging, Identity, Language and Diversity), draws on perspectives from outside as well as inside Montréal, and Québec, to show how people and policies interact in real-life contexts that defy description in terms of neat dichotomies. We take advantage of our many voices to harmonize a polyvocal conversation about language use on the ground in Montréal and further. Weaving together several strands of research and lived experience, we form a tapestry of complex language practices in constant combination and recombination. We further offer suggestions for ways to rethink official models of multiculturalism and bilingualism as frameworks for understanding how individuals in cities like Montréal use language in their everyday lives.

RÉSUMÉ

À Montréal, Québec, l’utilisation courante de la langue devient un délicat exercice d’équilibre qui va bien au-delà des catégories de bilinguisme / plurilinguisme ou des cadres théoriques reliés au multiculturalisme / interculturalisme. Les politiques linguistiques qui jusqu’à un certain point dominent le paysage linguistique québécois, peuvent être vues en tant qu’objets de manipulation et de négociation constante, par des individus et des communautés qui mettent en pratique des actions sur le plan local. Ces actions sont déterminées et significatives seulement à ce niveau. Notre communauté de recherche basée à Montréal, LIDA (langue, identité, diversité et appartenance) se fonde sur des perspectives situées à l’extérieur ainsi qu’à l’intérieur de Montréal et du Québec; nous cherchons à montrer comment les gens et les politiques interagissent dans divers contextes de la vie quotidienne, contextes qui défient toute description en termes de dichotomies nettes. En utilisant nos multiples voix, nous harmonisons une conversation polyvocale autour des usages linguistiques sur le terrain à Montréal et au-delà. Nous tissons une riche tapisserie de pratiques langagières complexes, en combinaison et recombinaison constante, à partir de plusieurs fils tirés de la recherche et de notre expérience vécue. Nous offrons aussi des suggestions qui permettraient de repenser les modèles officiels de multiculturalisme et de bilinguisme en tant que cadres conceptuels pour comprendre comment les gens habitant des villes comme Montréal utilisent le langage dans leurs vies quotidiennes.

Keywords: multilingualism, interculturalism, language policy, polyvocality.
Continue reading “Unofficial Multilingualism in an Intercultural Province: Polyvocal Responses to Policy as Lived Experience”

Editorial

Volume 1(1): 2017

ALISON CRUMP (Senior Managing Editor), McGill University
LAUREN GODFREY-SMITH (Managing Editor), Royal Roads University

 

It is a wonderful sense of achievement to be writing this editorial, the first of what we hope will be many for the new Journal of Belonging, Identity, Language, and Diversity (J-BILD) / Revue de langage, d’identité, de diversité et d’appartenance (R-LIDA). As this is the inaugural issue of J-BILD, we thought we should start this editorial with our origin story—we believe it is an example of how much can be accomplished at the grassroots level within academic communities.

J-BILD is the newest branch of a wider BILD research group, which began at McGill in 2013. The BILD research group first came together as the brainchild of Dr. Mela Sarkar (now Senior Advisor to J-BILD), who noticed that several graduate students in the Department of Integrated Studies in Education (DISE) at McGill with very different research projects were similarly interested in exploring issues related to belonging, identity, language, and diversity. In 2013, Mela organized a casual lunchtime meeting for us to get to know one another and share ideas. A number of us kept meeting and talking and eventually decided to give our group a name: the Belonging, Identity, Language, and Diversity (BILD) research group. In the first year, our meetings were something like a book club—we met regularly to discuss an article related to our interests. We later presented as a group at some conferences, developed a social media presence (Twitter, Facebook), staged a few of our own symposia, and started a blog, which now has international readership. Since the fall of 2014, we have been publishing weekly blog posts written either by BILD group members, or guest bloggers. In 2016, we started the BILD Speaker Series and invite visiting scholars to present their research as BILD guests. In June, 2017, we were proud to be the invited keynote symposium at the ACLA/CAAL (Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics) conference at Ryerson University in Toronto where four BILD members presented on the topic of innovative methodologies in Applied Linguistics. In 2016, three years after that first lunchtime meeting, we started planning our newest and most ambitious project: the launch of a scholarly journal, J-BILD. Although J-BILD is new, because of its roots in the BILD research group, we are confident that we already have international reach. This is reflected in the composition of our editorial team, which includes members from across Canada, as well as Iran, Ireland, South Africa, Tasmania, and the United States. We look forward to seeing how this team will grow with each subsequent issue.

J-BILD is founded on several defining principles:

• J-BILD is an open source and open access journal.

Part of the ethos of the BILD research group since its beginnings in 2013 has been to foster a growing community of scholars, researchers, and teachers, who similarly explore issues related to belonging, identity, language, and diversity. As such, J-BILD is an exclusively online, open source and open access journal, which allows us to make publications immediately and permanently free for everyone to read, download and share. J-BILD contributes to a movement in the world of scholarly publishing that increases access to knowledge, facilitates collaboration, raises researcher visibility, and builds community. As an online journal, we have can include multiple modes of scholarly work in our publications. Over time, we hope to leverage the potential of online publishing and we invite submissions that move beyond the written mode.

• J-BILD is a non-anonymized peer mentoring journal.

We firmly believe that the anonymity in the traditional publishing model does not guarantee scholarly rigour. We have been inspired by the Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education (CJNSE), which has been operating as a mentoring journal for over a decade. Rather than relying on an anonymous peer review process, J-BILD relies on the gracious contributions and commitments of peer mentors who work directly with authors through the revision process. J-BILD’s non-anonymized peer mentoring not only provides authors with respectful and constructive feedback on their work, it also develops a sense of collegiality among J-BILD mentors and authors, once again, contributing to the goal of building community. For this issue, we have worn several hats, as editors and authors/ mentees, and have certainly found the open peer review process to be a very positive and constructive one.

• J-BILD is committed to recognizing and valuing all stages of the research process.

This means that we welcome submissions from emerging and more experienced scholars. For this first issue, we were happy to have received a variety of types of submissions that reflect the range of stages of the research process—research proposals; critical literature reviews; and research studies. We received ten submissions, six of which have progressed to the publication stage and appear in this issue.

The articles in this issue show us that there are many ways to examine the intersections of issues of belonging, identity, language, and diversity.

Research Studies

“Unofficial multilingualism in an intercultural province: Polyvocal responses to policy as lived experience,” by Casey Burkholder, Alison Crump, Lauren Godfrey-Smith, and Mela Sarkar is a co-authored and collaborative piece of writing, with multiple voices and multiple research projects of the BILD community represented and woven throughout in a polyvocal conversation. In this paper, these polyvocal voices critically reflect on official models of multiculturalism and bilingualism as frameworks for understanding how individuals in cities like Montréal use language in their everyday lives. The authors conclude their conversation with suggestions of ways to rethink official models of multiculturalism and bilingualism.

Karen Pennesi, author of “Universal design for belonging: Living and working with diverse personal names,” presents the results of extensive interview and literature research to show how institutional agents manage name diversity. Pennesi argues that concerns with saving face and being polite can involve micro-aggressions, which can have implications to do with exclusion, belonging, and other disadvantage for people with certain kinds of names. Pennesi’s recommendations for normalizing name diversity in work and social life make a significant contribution to making multilingual and multi-ethnic societies more welcoming to immigrants and other with diverse names

In their article, “Les représentations sociales sur les langues d’élèves de la fin de l’élémentaire en contexte francophone minoritaire,” Joël Thibeault and Carole Fleuret share the results of a multiple case study of eight elementary school students studying in French. Thibeault and Fleuret bring to light their participants’ social representation of language as well as the potential connections between these representations and participants’ subject-verb agreement. J-BILD readers may be particularly interested in the themes of plurilingualism that emerged from the study and the authors’ discussion of the importance of taking into account learners’ plurilingualism in their teaching practice.

Critical Literature Reviews

Chris Gosling, author of “Identity as a research lens in science and physics education,” begins his critical literature review by problematizing how gender in Physics Education Research (PER) has traditionally focused on gender as a differentiator between how female and male students learn or engage with physics. Gosling goes on to present an insightful review of the relevant literature related to PER and the complex and intersectional nature of student learning as gendered identity formation within the culture of school science. Gosling investigates and sheds light on how identity is employed by researchers of PER and how its use can help move gender research in physics beyond a binary perspective of gender.

“Understanding the connections between second language teacher identity, efficacy and attrition: a critical review of recent literature,” by Philippa Parks, explores the issue of teacher attrition among additional language teachers. Parks seeks to address the question of what it is about additional language teachers that makes them particularly prone to leaving the profession. Parks considers the role of self-efficacy and identity in teacher attribution, with a view to informing how additional language education can address the issue of attrition.

Research Proposal

Milagros b. Calderón Moya’s research proposal, “Issues related to interprovincial migration in Quebec: A Latin American perspective,” seeks to examine the perspectives of skilled Latin American immigrants towards interprovincial migration in Quebec and bring to light how the lack of adequate awareness of diversity in public school philosophies has resulted in the othering of minority groups in Quebec, making their departure to other provinces more likely. The potential contribution of the proposed research is clearly articulated by Calderón Moya when she says, “This research will provide immigration authorities and education specialists with tools that can provide fair educational and employment opportunities that truly resemble Quebec’s democratic values to Quebec’s current and future newcomers.”

Closing Thoughts

As a new journal, we recognize that there are many ways in which we can grow. In the short term, we hope to develop the resources to have a fully bilingual (English and French) journal site and also to leverage the potential of online publishing more widely.

We would like to close by expressing our deep appreciation of the authors for trusting their work with us, as well as the peer mentors who have worked closely with authors, often with several rounds of revisions, and on a very tight timeline (tight in the world of publishing). It is due to the dedication, collaboration, and commitment of the mentors and authors that we have been able to move from the inaugural call for papers in May to this first issue in November. We hope that you enjoy reading the issue as much as we have enjoyed putting it together.

 

css.php